J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nahm, F. K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Albright, a. T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nahm, F. K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Albright, a. T. D.

The Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol 9, 611-623, Copyright © 1997 by The MIT Press

ARTICLES

How Do Monkeys Look at Faces?

Frederick K. D. Nahm, Amelie Perret, David G. Amaral and and Thomas D. Albright

Facial displays are an important form of social communication in nonhuman primates. Clues to the information conveyed by faces are the temporal and spatial characteristics of ocular viewing patterns to facial images. The present study compares viewing patterns of four rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to a set of 1- and 3-sec video segments of conspecific facial displays, which included open-mouth threat, lip-smack, yawn, fear-grimace, and neutral profile. Both static and dynamic video images were used. Static human faces displaying open-mouth threat, smile, and neutral gestures were also presented. Eye position was recorded with a surgically implanted eye-coil. The relative perceptual salience of the eyes, the midface, and the mouth across different expressive gestures was determined by analyzing the number of eye movements associated with each feature during static and dynamic presentations. The results indicate that motion does not significantly affect the viewing patterns to expressive facial displays, and when given a choice, monkeys spend a relatively large amount of time inspecting the face, especially the eyes, as opposed to areas surrounding the face. The expressive nature of the facial display also affected viewing patterns in that threatening and fear-related displays evoked a pattern of viewing that differed from that recorded during the presentation of submissive-related facial displays. From these results we conclude that (1) the most important determinant of the visual inspection patterns of faces is the constellation of physiognomic features and their configuration, but not facial motion, (2) the eyes are generally the most salient facial feature, and (3) the agonistic or affiliative dimension of an expressive facial display can be delineated on the basis of viewing patterns.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. F. Ferrari, E. Kohler, L. Fogassi, and V. Gallese
The ability to follow eye gaze and its emergence during development in macaque monkeys
PNAS, November 22, 2000; (2000) 250241197.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Cereb CortexHome page
G. McCarthy, A. Puce, A. Belger, and T. Allison
Electrophysiological Studies of Human Face Perception. II: Response Properties of Face-specific Potentials Generated in Occipitotemporal Cortex
Cereb Cortex, July 1, 1999; 9(5): 431 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. F. Ferrari, E. Kohler, L. Fogassi, and V. Gallese
The ability to follow eye gaze and its emergence during development in macaque monkeys
PNAS, December 5, 2000; 97(25): 13997 - 14002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 1997 by The MIT Press.