J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pugh, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mencl, W. E.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pugh, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mencl, W. E.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2008;20:1146-1160.)
© 2008 The MIT Press

Effects of Stimulus Difficulty and Repetition on Printed Word Identification: An fMRI Comparison of Nonimpaired and Reading-disabled Adolescent Cohorts

Kenneth R. Pugh1,2, Stephen J. Frost1, Rebecca Sandak1, Nicole Landi1, Jay G. Rueckl1,3, R. Todd Constable2, Mark S. Seidenberg1,4, Robert K. Fulbright2, Leonard Katz1,3 and W. Einar Mencl1

1 Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, 2 Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 3 University of Connecticut, 4 University of Wisconsin

Reprint requests should be sent to Kenneth R. Pugh, Haskins Laboratories, 300 George Street, New Haven, CT 06511, or via e-mail: pugh{at}haskins.yale.edu.

Functional neuroimaging studies indicate that a primary marker of specific reading disability (RD) is reduced activation of left hemisphere (LH) posterior regions during performance of reading tasks. However, the severity of this disruption, and the extent to which these LH systems might be available for reading under any circumstances, is unclear at present. Experiment 1 examined the cortical effects of stimulus manipulations (frequency, imageability, consistency) that have known facilitative effects on reading performance for both nonimpaired (NI) and RD readers. Experiment 2 examined stimulus repetition, another facilitative variable, in an additional sample of adolescent NI and RD readers. For NI readers, factors that made words easier to process were associated with relatively reduced activation. For RD readers, facilitative factors resulted in increased activation in these same reading-related sites, suggesting that the LH reading circuitry in adolescent RD is poorly trained but not wholly disrupted.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by The MIT Press.