J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wendelken, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bunge, S. A.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wendelken, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bunge, S. A.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2008;20:682-693.)
© 2008 The MIT Press

"Brain Is to Thought as Stomach Is to ??": Investigating the Role of Rostrolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Relational Reasoning

Carter Wendelken1,2, Denis Nakhabenko1, Sarah E. Donohue1, Cameron S. Carter1 and Silvia A. Bunge1,2

1 University of California at Davis, 2 University of California at Berkeley

Reprint requests should be sent to Carter Wendelken, 126 Barker Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, or via e-mail: cwendelken{at}berkeley.edu.

Brain imaging studies suggest that the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC), is involved in relational reasoning. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies involving Raven's Progressive Matrices or verbal propositional analogies indicate that the RLPFC is engaged by tasks that require integration across multiple relational structures. Several studies have shown that the RLPFC is more active when people must evaluate an analogy (e.g., Is shoe to foot as glove is to hand?) than when they must simply evaluate two individual semantic relationships, consistent with the hypothesis that this region is important for relational integration. The current fMRI investigation further explores the role of the RLPFC in reasoning and relational integration by comparing RLPFC activation across four different propositional analogy conditions. Each of the four conditions required either relation completion (e.g., Shoe is to foot as glove is to WHAT? -> "hand") or relation comparison (e.g., Is shoe to foot as glove is to hand? -> "yes"). The RLPFC was engaged more strongly by the comparison subtask relative to completion, suggesting that the RLPFC is particularly involved in comparing relational structures.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by The MIT Press.