J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pastötter, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bäuml, K.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pastötter, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bäuml, K.-H.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2008;20:65-75.)
© 2008 The MIT Press

Inhibition of Return Arises from Inhibition of Response Processes: An Analysis of Oscillatory Beta Activity

Bernhard Pastötter, Simon Hanslmayr and Karl-Heinz Bäuml

Regensburg University, Regensburg, Germany

Reprint requests should be sent to Bernhard Pastötter, Department of Experimental Psychology, Regensburg University, 93040 Regensburg, Germany, or via e-mail: bernhard.pastoetter{at}psychologie.uni-regensburg.de.

In the orienting of attention paradigm, inhibition of return (IOR) refers to slowed responses to targets presented at the same location as a preceding stimulus. No consensus has yet been reached regarding the stages of information processing underlying the inhibition. We report the results of an electroencephalogram experiment designed to examine the involvement of response inhibition in IOR. Using a cue–target design and a target–target design, we addressed the role of response inhibition in a location discrimination task. Event-related changes in beta power were measured because oscillatory beta activity has been shown to be related to motor activity. Bilaterally located sources in the primary motor cortex showed event-related beta desynchronization (ERD) both at cue and target presentation and a rebound to event-related beta synchronization (ERS) after movement execution. In both designs, IOR arose from an enhancement of beta synchrony. IOR was related to an increase of beta ERS in the target–target design and to a decrease of beta ERD in the cue–target design. These results suggest an important role of response inhibition in IOR.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by The MIT Press.