HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rorden, C. Articles by Bonilha, L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Rorden, C. Articles by Bonilha, L.

Improving Lesion–Symptom Mapping

¹ University of South Carolina, ² University of Tuebingen, Germany

Reprint requests should be sent to Chris Rorden, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, SC 29208, or via e-mail: chris{at}mricro.com.

Measures of brain activation (e.g., changes in scalp electrical potentials) have become the most popular method for inferring brain function. However, examining brain disruption (e.g., examining behavior after brain injury) can complement activation studies. Activation techniques identify regions involved with a task, whereas disruption techniques are able to discover which regions are crucial for a task. Voxel-based lesion mapping can be used to determine relationships between behavioral measures and the location of brain injury, revealing the function of brain regions. Lesion mapping can also correlate the effectiveness of neurosurgery with the location of brain resection, identifying optimal surgical targets. Traditionally, voxel-based lesion mapping has employed the chi-square test when the clinical measure is binomial and the Student's t test when measures are continuous. Here we suggest that the Liebermeister approach for binomial data is more sensitive than the chi-square test. We also suggest that a test described by Brunner and Munzel is more appropriate than the t test for nonbinomial data because clinical and neuropsychological data often violate the assumptions of the t test. We test our hypotheses comparing statistical tests using both simulated data and data obtained from a sample of stroke patients with disturbed spatial perception. We also developed software to implement these tests (MRIcron), made freely available to the scientific community.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Ellison-Wright, D. C. Glahn, A. R. Laird, S. M. Thelen, and E. Bullmore The Anatomy of First-Episode and Chronic Schizophrenia: An Anatomical Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis Am J Psychiatry, August 1, 2008; 165(8): 1015 - 1023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. K. Fellows, M. Stark, A. Berg, and A. Chatterjee Patient registries in cognitive neuroscience research: advantages, challenges, and practical advice. J. Cogn. Neurosci., June 1, 2008; 20(6): 1107 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Molenberghs, C. R. Gillebert, R. Peeters, and R. Vandenberghe Convergence between Lesion-Symptom Mapping and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Spatially Selective Attention in the Intact Brain J. Neurosci., March 26, 2008; 28(13): 3359 - 3373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Pazzaglia, N. Smania, E. Corato, and S. M. Aglioti Neural Underpinnings of Gesture Discrimination in Patients with Limb Apraxia J. Neurosci., March 19, 2008; 28(12): 3030 - 3041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]