HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Persson, J. Articles by Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Persson, J. Articles by Reuter-Lorenz, P. A.

Age Differences in Deactivation: A Link to Cognitive Control?

University of Michigan

Reprint requests should be sent to Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, East Hall, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1109, or via e-mail: parl{at}umich.edu.

The network of regions shown by functional imaging studies to be deactivated by experimental tasks relative to nominally more passive baselines (task < baseline) may reflect processes engaged during the resting state or "default mode." Deactivation may result when attention and resources are diverted from default-mode processes toward task processes. Aging is associated with altered patterns of deactivation which may be related to declining resources, difficulties with resource allocation, or both. These possibilities predict that greater task demand, which increases deactivation levels in younger adults, should exacerbate age-related declines in allocating resources away from the default mode. The present study investigated the magnitude and temporal properties of deactivations in young and older adults during tasks that varied in their demand for cognitive control. Two versions of a verb generation task that varied in their demand for selection among competing alternatives were compared to word reading and a fixation baseline condition. Consistent with our hypothesis, greater deactivations were found with increasing demand. Young and older adults showed equivalent deactivations in the minimal selection condition. By contrast, age differences in both the magnitude and time course of deactivation increased with selection demand: Compared to young adults', older adults' deactivation response showed less sensitivity to demand. Demand-related changes in deactivation magnitude correlated with performance changes, suggesting that individual and group differences in deactivation have functional significance.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Duverne, S. Motamedinia, and M. D. Rugg The Relationship between Aging, Performance, and the Neural Correlates of Successful Memory Encoding Cereb Cortex, July 24, 2008; (2008) bhn122v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Kensinger and D. L. Schacter Neural processes supporting young and older adults' emotional memories. J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2008; 20(7): 1161 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Miller, K. Celone, K. DePeau, E. Diamond, B. C. Dickerson, D. Rentz, M. Pihlajamaki, and R. A. Sperling Age-related memory impairment associated with loss of parietal deactivation but preserved hippocampal activation PNAS, February 12, 2008; 105(6): 2181 - 2186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]