J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snyder, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson-Schill, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Snyder, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson-Schill, S. L.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2007;19:761-775.)
© 2007 The MIT Press

Prefrontal Cortical Response to Conflict during Semantic and Phonological Tasks

Hannah R. Snyder, Keith Feigenson and Sharon L. Thompson-Schill

University of Pennsylvania

Reprint requests should be sent to Hannah R. Snyder, Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Muenzinger D 244, UCB 345, Boulder, CO 80309, or via e-mail: snyderhr{at}colorado.edu.

Debates about the function of the prefrontal cortex are as old as the field of neuropsychology—often dated to Paul Broca's seminal work. Theories of the functional organization of the prefrontal cortex can be roughly divided into those that describe organization by process and those that describe organization by material. Recent studies of the function of the posterior, left inferior frontal gyrus (pLIFG) have yielded two quite different interpretations: One hypothesis holds that the pLIFG plays a domain-specific role in phonological processing, whereas another hypothesis describes a more general function of the pLIFG in cognitive control. In the current study, we distinguish effects of increasing cognitive control demands from effects of phonological processing. The results support the hypothesized role for the pLIFG in cognitive control, and more task-specific roles for posterior areas in phonology and semantics. Thus, these results suggest an alternative explanation of previously reported phonology-specific effects in the pLIFG.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by The MIT Press.