HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rounis, E. Articles by Rothwell, J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Rounis, E. Articles by Rothwell, J. C.

Effects of rTMS Conditioning over the Fronto-parietal Network on Motor versus Visual Attention

¹ University College London, ² Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, UCL, London

Reprint requests should be sent to Elisabeth Rounis, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, 8–11 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK, or via e-mail: e.rounis{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk.

Many studies have shown that visuospatial orienting attention depends on a network of frontal and parietal areas in the right hemisphere. Rushworth et al. [Rushworth, M. F., Krams, M., & Passingham, R. E. The attentional role of the left parietal cortex: The distinct lateralization and localization of motor attention in the human brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 698–710, 2001] have recently provided evidence for a left-lateralized network of parietal areas involved in motor attention. Using two variants of a cued reaction time (RT) task, we set out to investigate whether high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS; 5 Hz) delivered "off-line" in a virtual lesion paradigm over the right or left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) would affect performance in a motor versus a visual attention task. Although rTMS over the DLPFC on either side did not affect RT performance on a spatial orienting task, it did lead to an increase in the RTs of invalidly cued trials in a motor attention task when delivered to the left DLPFC. The opposite effect was found when rTMS was delivered to the PPC: In this case, conditioning the right PPC led to increased RTs in invalidly cued trials located in the left hemispace, in the spatial orienting task. rTMS over the PPC on either side did not affect performance in the motor attention task. This double dissociation was evident in the first 10 min after rTMS conditioning. These results enhance our understanding of the networks associated with attention. They provide evidence of a role for the left DLPFC in the mechanisms of motor preparation, and confirm Mesulam's original proposal for a right PPC dominance in spatial attention [Mesulam, M. M. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology, 10, 309–325, 1981].

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Plaza, P. Gatignol, H. Cohen, B. Berger, and H. Duffau A Discrete Area within the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Involved in Visual-Verbal Incongruence Judgment Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2008; 18(6): 1253 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]