J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parris, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hodgson, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Parris, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hodgson, T. L.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2007;19:13-24.)
© 2007 The MIT Press

The Role of the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex and Anterior Cingulate in Stimulus–Response Association Reversals

Benjamin A. Parris, Ngoc J. Thai, Abdelmalek Benattayallah, Ian R. Summers and Timothy L. Hodgson

University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

Reprint requests should be sent to Timothy L. Hodgson, Exeter Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK, or via e-mail: t.l.hodgson{at}ex.ac.uk.

Many complex tasks require us to flexibly switch between behavioral rules, associations, and strategies. The prefrontal cerebral cortex is thought to be critical to the performance of such behaviors, although the relative contribution of different components of this structure and associated subcortical regions are not fully understood. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure brain activity during a simple task which required repeated reversals of a rule linking a colored cue and a left/right motor response. Each trial comprised three discrete events separated by variable delay periods. A colored cue instructed which response was to be executed, followed by a go signal which told the subject to execute the response and a feedback instruction which indicated whether to "hold" or "flip" the rule linking the colored cue and response. The design allowed us to determine which brain regions were recruited by the specific demands of preparing a rule contingent motor response, executing such a response, evaluating the significance of the feedback, and reconfiguring stimulus–response (SR) associations. The results indicate that an increase in neural activity occurs within the anterior cingulate gyrus under conditions in which SR associations are labile. In contrast, lateral frontal regions are activated by unlikely/unexpected perceptual events regardless of their significance for behavior. A network of subcortical structures, including the mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus and striatum were the only regions showing activity that was exclusively correlated with the neurocognitive demands of reversing SR associations. We conclude that lateral frontal regions act to evaluate the behavioral significance of perceptual events, whereas medial frontal–thalamic circuits are involved in monitoring and reconfiguring SR associations when necessary.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Aarts, A. Roelofs, and M. van Turennout
Anticipatory Activity in Anterior Cingulate Cortex Can Be Independent of Conflict and Error Likelihood
J. Neurosci., April 30, 2008; 28(18): 4671 - 4678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. Chikazoe, K. Jimura, T. Asari, K.-i. Yamashita, H. Morimoto, S. Hirose, Y. Miyashita, and S. Konishi
Functional Dissociation in Right Inferior Frontal Cortex during Performance of Go/No-Go Task
Cereb Cortex, April 28, 2008; (2008) bhn065v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by The MIT Press.