J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potts, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Montague, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Potts, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Montague, P. R.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2006;18:1112-1119.)
© 2006 The MIT Press

When Things Are Better or Worse than Expected: The Medial Frontal Cortex and the Allocation of Processing Resources

Geoffrey F. Potts1, Laura E. Martin1, Philip Burton1 and P. Read Montague2

1 Rice University, Houston, TX, 2 Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

Reprint requests should be sent to Geoffrey F. Potts, Rice University, Psychology MS-25, P.O. Box 1892, Houston, TX 77005-1892, or via e-mail: gpotts{at}rice.edu.

Access to limited-capacity neural systems of cognitive control must be restricted to the most relevant information. How the brain identifies and selects items for preferential processing is not fully understood. Anatomical models often place the selection mechanism in the medial frontal cortex (MFC), and one computational model proposes that the mesotelencephalic dopamine (DA) system, via its reward prediction properties, provides a "gate" through which information gains access to limited-capacity systems. There is a medial frontal event-related potential (ERP) index of attention selection, the anterior positivity (P2a), associated with DA reward system input to the MFC for the identification of task-relevant perceptual representations. The P2a has a similar spatio-temporal distribution as the medial frontal negativity (MFN), elicited to error responses or choices resulting in monetary loss. The MFN has also been linked to DA projections to the MFC but for action monitoring rather than attention selection. This study proposes that the P2a and the MFN reflect the same MFC evaluation function and use a passive reward prediction design containing neither instructed attention nor response to demonstrate that the ERP over medial frontal leads at the P2a/MFN latency is consistent with activity of midbrain DA neurons, positive to unpredicted rewards and negative when a predicted reward is withheld. This result suggests that MFC activity is regulated by DA reward system input and may function to identify items or actions that exceed or fail to meet motivational prediction.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soc Cogn Affect NeurosciHome page
H. Fukushima and K. Hiraki
Perceiving an opponent's loss: gender-related differences in the medial-frontal negativity
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, September 1, 2006; 1(2): 149 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The MIT Press.