HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Muhammad, R. Articles by Miller, E. K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Muhammad, R. Articles by Miller, E. K.

A Comparison of Abstract Rules in the Prefrontal Cortex, Premotor Cortex, Inferior Temporal Cortex, and Striatum

¹ The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, RIKEN-MIT Neuroscience Research Center, and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusets Institute of Technology, ² Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California at Berkeley

Reprint requests should be sent to Earl K. Miller, The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, RIKEN-MIT Neuroscience Research Center, and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, or via e-mail: ekmiller{at}mit.edu.

The ability to use abstract rules or principles allows behavior to generalize from specific circumstances. We have previously shown that such rules are encoded in the lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) and premotor cortex (PMC). Here, we extend these investigations to two other areas directly connected with the PFC and the PMC, the inferior temporal cortex (ITC) and the dorsal striatum (STR). Monkeys were trained to use two abstract rules: "same" or "different". They had to either hold or release a lever, depending on whether two successively presented pictures were the same or different, and depending on which rule was in effect. The rules and the behavioral responses were reflected most strongly and, on average, tended to be earlier in the PMC followed by the PFC and then the STR; few neurons in the ITC reflected the rules or the actions. By contrast, perceptual information (the identity of the pictures used as sample and test stimuli) was encoded more strongly and earlier in the ITC, followed by the PFC; they had weak, if any, effects on neural activity in the PMC and STR. These findings are discussed in the context of the anatomy and posited functions of these areas.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. F.S. RUSHWORTH Intention, Choice, and the Medial Frontal Cortex Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., March 1, 2008; 1124(1): 181 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Li, D. Ostwald, M. Giese, and Z. Kourtzi Flexible Coding for Categorical Decisions in the Human Brain J. Neurosci., November 7, 2007; 27(45): 12321 - 12330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Lemus, A. Hernandez, R. Luna, A. Zainos, V. Nacher, and R. Romo Neural correlates of a postponed decision report PNAS, October 23, 2007; 104(43): 17174 - 17179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. Fitzsimmons, W. Drake, T. L. Hanson, M. A. Lebedev, and M. A. L. Nicolelis Primate Reaching Cued by Multichannel Spatiotemporal Cortical Microstimulation J. Neurosci., May 23, 2007; 27(21): 5593 - 5602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]