J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conci, M.
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Conci, M.
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, M. A.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2006;18:880-888.)
© 2006 The MIT Press

Electrophysiological Correlates of Similarity-based Interference during Detection of Visual Forms

Markus Conci1, Klaus Gramann1, Hermann J. Müller1 and Mark A. Elliott1,2

1 Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, Germany, 2 National University of Ireland, Republic of Ireland

Reprint requests should be sent to Markus Conci, Allgemeine und Experimentelle Psychologie, Department Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, Leopoldstr. 13, D-80802 München, Germany, or via e-mail: conci{at}psy.uni-muenchen.de.

Illusory figure completion demonstrates the ability of the visual system to integrate information across gaps. Mechanisms that underlie figural emergence support the interpolation of contours and the filling-in of form information [Grossberg, S., & Mingolla, E. Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures and neon colour spreading. Psychological Review, 92, 173–211, 1985]. Although both processes contribute to figure formation, visual search for an illusory target configuration has been shown to be susceptible to interfering form, but not contour, information [Conci, M., Müller, H. J., & Elliott, M. A. The contrasting impact of global and local object attributes on Kanizsa figure detection. Submitted]. Here, the physiological basis of form interference was investigated by recording event-related potentials elicited from contour- and surface-based distracter interactions with detection of a target Kanizsa figure. The results replicated the finding of form interference and revealed selection of the target and successful suppression of the irrelevant distracter to be reflected by amplitude differences in the N2pc component (240–340 msec). In conclusion, the observed component variations reflect processes of target selection on the basis of integrated form information resulting from figural completion processes.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The MIT Press.