J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruff, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Driver, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ruff, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Driver, J.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2006;18:522-538.)
© 2006 The MIT Press

Attentional Preparation for a Lateralized Visual Distractor: Behavioral and fMRI Evidence

Christian C. Ruff and Jon Driver

University College London

Reprint requests should be sent to Christian Ruff, UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Alexandra House, 17 Queen Square, London WC1 3AR, UK, or via e-mail: c.ruff@ucl.ac.uk.

Attending to the location of an expected visual target can lead to anticipatory activations in spatiotopic occipital cortex, emerging before target onset. But less is known about how the brain may prepare for a distractor at a known location remote from the target. In a psychophysical experiment, we found that trial-to-trial advance knowledge about the presence of a distractor in the target-opposite hemifield significantly reduced its behavioral cost. In a subsequent functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment with similar task and stimuli, we found anticipatory activations in the occipital cortex contralateral to the expected distractor, but no additional target modulation, when participants were given advance information about a distractor's subsequent presence and location. Several attention-related control structures (frontal eye fields and superior parietal cortex) were active during attentional preparation for all trials, whereas the left superior prefrontal and right angular gyri were additionally activated when a distractor was anticipated. The right temporoparietal junction showed stronger functional coupling with occipital regions during preparation for trials with an isolated target than for trials with a distractor expected. These results show that anticipation of a visual distractor at a known location, remote from the target, can lead to (1) a reduction in the behavioral cost of that distractor, (2) preparatory modulation of the occipital cortex contralateral to the location of the expected distractor, and (3) anticipatory activation of distinct parietal and frontal brain structures. These findings indicate that specific components of preparatory visual attention may be devoted to minimizing the impact of distractors, not just to enhancements of target processing.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
S. E. Donohue, C. Wendelken, and S. A. Bunge
Neural correlates of preparation for action selection as a function of specific task demands.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., April 1, 2008; 20(4): 694 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. M. Sylvester, G. L. Shulman, A. I. Jack, and M. Corbetta
Asymmetry of Anticipatory Activity in Visual Cortex Predicts the Locus of Attention and Perception
J. Neurosci., December 26, 2007; 27(52): 14424 - 14433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. A. Stevens, M. Snodgrass, D. Schwartz, and K. Weaver
Preparatory Activity in Occipital Cortex in Early Blind Humans Predicts Auditory Perceptual Performance
J. Neurosci., October 3, 2007; 27(40): 10734 - 10741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. J. Geng, E. Eger, C. C. Ruff, A. Kristjansson, P. Rotshtein, and J. Driver
On-Line Attentional Selection From Competing Stimuli in Opposite Visual Fields: Effects on Human Visual Cortex and Control Processes
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2601 - 2612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The MIT Press.