J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Zelazo, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Zelazo, P. D.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2006;18:430-443.)
© 2006 The MIT Press

Neurophysiological Correlates of Emotion Regulation in Children and Adolescents

Marc D. Lewis1, Connie Lamm1, Sidney J. Segalowitz2, Jim Stieben3 and Philip David Zelazo1

1 University of Toronto, 2 Brock University, 3 York University

Reprint requests should be sent to Marc D. Lewis, Department of Human Development and Applied Psychology, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, 252 Bloor Street West, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1V6, Canada, or via e-mail: mlewis{at}oise.utoronto.ca.

Psychologists consider emotion regulation a critical developmental acquisition. Yet, there has been very little research on the neural underpinnings of emotion regulation across childhood and adolescence. We selected two ERP components associated with inhibitory control—the frontal N2 and frontal P3. We recorded these components before, during, and after a negative emotion induction, and compared their amplitude, latency, and source localization over age. Fifty-eight children 5–16 years of age engaged in a simple go/no-go procedure in which points for successful performance earned a valued prize. The temporary loss of all points triggered negative emotions, as confirmed by self-report scales. Both the frontal N2 and frontal P3 decreased in amplitude and latency with age, consistent with the hypothesis of increasing cortical efficiency. Amplitudes were also greater following the emotion induction, only for adolescents for the N2 but across the age span for the frontal P3, suggesting different but overlapping profiles of emotion-related control mechanisms. No-go N2 amplitudes were greater than go N2 amplitudes following the emotion induction at all ages, suggesting a consistent effect of negative emotion on mechanisms of response inhibition. No-go P3 amplitudes were also greater than go P3 amplitudes and they decreased with age, whereas go P3 amplitudes remained low. Finally, source modeling indicated a developmental decline in central-posterior midline activity paralleled by increasing activity in frontal midline regions suggestive of the anterior cingulate cortex. Negative emotion induction corresponded with an additional right ventral prefrontal or temporal generator beginning in middle childhood.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentHome page
T. Hollenstein
State space grids: Analyzing dynamics across development
International Journal of Behavioral Development, July 1, 2007; 31(4): 384 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
M. D. LEWIS, I. GRANIC, and C. LAMM
Behavioral Differences in Aggressive Children Linked with Neural Mechanisms of Emotion Regulation
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2006; 1094(1): 164 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The MIT Press.