J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forstmann, B. U.
Right arrow Articles by von Cramon, D. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forstmann, B. U.
Right arrow Articles by von Cramon, D. Y.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2006;18:388-398.)
© 2006 The MIT Press

Voluntary Selection of Task Sets Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Birte U. Forstmann, Marcel Brass, Iring Koch and D. Yves von Cramon

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences

Reprint requests should be sent to Birte U. Forstmann, Department of Cognitive Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstr. 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany, or via e-mail: forstman{at}cbs.mpg.de.

In everyday life, we have to selectively adapt our behavior to different situations and tasks. In cognitive psychology, such adaptive behavior can be investigated with the task-switching paradigm. However, in contrast to everyday life, in experiments participants are unequivocally told which task to perform. The present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was set out to investigate processes that are relevant when participants can decide by their own which task to perform. The number of tasks to choose from was varied between a forced condition (no choice) and two voluntary selection conditions (two or three choices). We expected to find prolonged reaction times as well as higher activations within the midcingulate cortex for the choice conditions compared to the no-choice condition. The fMRI results revealed a significant activation difference for the choice conditions versus the no-choice condition. For the choice contrast, activation was found in the rostral cingulate zone (RCZ) as well as the superior parietal lobule and the posterior part of the intraparietal sulcus. These activations revealed no selection-specific difference between three and two choices. Finally, a post hoc analysis showed that the activation in the RCZ is not associated with higher task-dependent response conflict when participants can select a task set. Taken together, these findings indicate that distinct brain areas are involved in the voluntary selection of abstract task set information.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Aarts, A. Roelofs, and M. van Turennout
Anticipatory Activity in Anterior Cingulate Cortex Can Be Independent of Conflict and Error Likelihood
J. Neurosci., April 30, 2008; 28(18): 4671 - 4678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
M. F.S. RUSHWORTH
Intention, Choice, and the Medial Frontal Cortex
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., March 1, 2008; 1124(1): 181 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The MIT Press.