J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weidner, R.
Right arrow Articles by Fink, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weidner, R.
Right arrow Articles by Fink, G. R.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2006;18:258-266.)
© 2006 The MIT Press

The Neural Basis of Perceptual Hypothesis Generation and Testing

R. Weidner1,2, N. J. Shah1,2 and G. R. Fink1,2,3

1 Research Centre Jülich, Institute of Medicine, 2 Brain Imaging Centre West, Research Centre Jülich, 3 Department of Neurology-Cognitive Neurology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen

Reprint requests should be sent to Ralph Weidner, Institut für Medizin, AG Kognitive Neurologie, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Leo-Brandt-Strasse 5, 52425 Juelich, Germany, or via e-mail: r.weidner{at}fz-juelich.de.

Four-dot masking is a new form of visual masking that does not involve local contour interactions or spatial superimposition of the target stimulus and the mask (as, e.g., in pattern or metacontrast masking). Rather, the effective masking mechanism is based on object substitution. Object substitution masking occurs when low-level visual information representations are altered before target identification through iterative interaction with high-level visual processing stages has been completed. Interestingly, object substitution interacts with attention processes: Strong masking effects are observed when attentional orientation toward the target location is delayed. In contrast, no masking occurs when attention can be rapidly shifted to and engaged onto the target location. We investigated the neural basis of object substitution masking by studying the interaction of spatial attention and masking processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Behavioral data indicated a two-way interaction between the factors Spatial Attention (valid vs. invalid cueing) and Masking (four-dot vs. pattern masking). As expected, spatial attention improved performance more strongly during object substitution masking. Functional correlates of this interaction were found in the primary visual cortex, higher visual areas, and left intraparietal sulcus. A region-of-interest analysis in these areas revealed that the largest blood oxygenation level-dependent signal changes occurred during effective four-dot masking. In contrast, the weakest signal changes in these areas were observed when target visibility was highest. The data suggest that these areas represent an object substitution network dedicated to the generation and testing of a perceptual hypotheses as described by the object substitution theory of masking of Di-Lollo et al. [Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481–507, 2000].




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
J. J. Fahrenfort, H. S. Scholte, and V. A. F. Lamme
Masking disrupts reentrant processing in human visual cortex.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., September 1, 2007; 19(9): 1488 - 1497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The MIT Press.