J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fieger, A.
Right arrow Articles by Neville, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fieger, A.
Right arrow Articles by Neville, H. J.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2006;18:149-157.)
© 2006 The MIT Press

Auditory Spatial Tuning in Late-onset Blindness in Humans

Anne Fieger1,2, Brigitte Röder3, Wolfgang Teder-Sälejärvi4, Steven A. Hillyard4 and Helen J. Neville1

1 University of Oregon, Eugene, 2 Philipps-University Marburg, Germany, 3 University of Hamburg, Germany, 4 University of California, San Diego

Reprint requests should be sent to Brigitte Röder, Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Hamburg, Von-Melle Park 11, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany, or via e-mail: Brigitte.Roeder{at}uni-hamburg.de.

Blind individuals who lost their sight as older children or adults were compared with normally sighted controls in their ability to focus auditory spatial attention and to localize sounds in a noisy acoustic environment. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants attended to sounds presented in free field from either central or peripheral arrays of speakers with the task of detecting infrequent targets at the attended location. When attending to the central array of speakers, the two groups detected targets equally well, and their spatial tuning curves for both ERPs and target detections were highly similar. By contrast, late blind participants were significantly more accurate than sighted participants at localizing sounds in the periphery. For both groups, the early N1 amplitude to peripheral standard stimuli displayed no significant spatial tuning. In contrast, the amplitude of the later P3 elicited by targets/deviants displayed a more sharply tuned spatial gradient during peripheral attention in the late blind than in the sighted group. These findings were compared with those of a previous study of congenitally blind individuals in the same task [Röder, B., Teder-Sälejärvi, W., Sterr, A., Rösler, F., Hillyard, S. A., & Neville, H. J. Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans. Nature, 400, 162–166, 1999]. It was concluded that both late blind and congenitally blind individuals demonstrate an enhanced capability for focusing auditory attention in the periphery, but they do so via different mechanisms: whereas congenitally blind persons demonstrate a more sharply tuned early attentional filtering, manifested in the N1, late blind individuals show superiority in a later stage of target discrimination and recognition, indexed by the P3.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Rouger, S. Lagleyre, B. Fraysse, S. Deneve, O. Deguine, and P. Barone
From the Cover: Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators
PNAS, April 24, 2007; 104(17): 7295 - 7300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The MIT Press.