J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cothros, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gribble, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cothros, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gribble, P. L.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2006;18:2167-2176.)
© 2006 The MIT Press

Proactive Interference as a Result of Persisting Neural Representations of Previously Learned Motor Skills in Primary Motor Cortex

Nicholas Cothros, Stefan Köhler, Erin W. Dickie1,, Seyed M. Mirsattari and Paul L. Gribble

University of Western Ontario, Canada

Reprint requests should be sent to Paul L. Gribble, Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2, or via e-mail: pgribble{at}uwo.ca.

Learning to control movements in different dynamic environments is marked by proactive interference; learning a first skill interferes with the subsequent learning of a second one. The neural basis of this effect is poorly understood. We tested the idea that proactive interference results from persisting neural representations of previously learned skills in the primary motor cortex (M1). We used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of M1 to disrupt retention of a recently learned motor skill. If interference results from the retention of this skill then its disruption should be associated with reduced interference. Subjects reached to targets while interacting with a robotic arm that applied force fields to the limb. Fifteen minutes of 1-Hz rTMS to M1 impaired the retention of a first force field, and more importantly, reduced proactive interference when subjects learned a second one. Our findings suggest that retention and interference are linked at the level of M1.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. E. Brown, E. T. Wilson, M. A. Goodale, and P. L. Gribble
Motor Force Field Learning Influences Visual Processing of Target Motion
J. Neurosci., September 12, 2007; 27(37): 9975 - 9983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The MIT Press.