J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Verleger, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Verleger, R.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2006;18:2152-2166.)
© 2006 The MIT Press

Precursors of Insight in Event-related Brain Potentials

Simone Lang1,2, Nadine Kanngieser1, Piotr Jaskowski1,3, Hilde Haider4, Michael Rose5 and Rolf Verleger1

1 University of Lübeck, Germany, 2 University of Heidelberg, Germany, 3 University of Finance and Management, Warsaw, Poland, 4 University of Köln, Germany, 5 University of Hamburg Medical School, Germany

Reprint requests should be sent to Rolf Verleger, University of Lübeck, Department of Neurology, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany, or via e-mail: rolf.verleger{at}neuro.uni-luebeck.de.

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were investigated to find precursors of insightful behavior. Participants had to process successive pairs in strings of digits to obtain a final response in each trial. Within the sequence of five responses required in each trial, the last two responses mirrored the two preceding ones. This hidden regularity, allowing for shortcutting each trial from five to two responses, was discovered by 6 out of 26 participants. Both groups, solvers and nonsolvers, implicitly learned the regularity, reflected by faster responses to the repeated, predictable responses, but this differential effect was larger in solvers, whereas nonsolvers became unspecifically faster with all responses. Several ERP components were larger in solvers than in nonsolvers from the outset: slow positive wave, frontocentral P3a, anterior N1 to those digits that triggered the critical repeating responses, and P3b to the digit that evoked the immediately repeating response. Being already present in the first block, these effects were early precursors of insightful behavior. This early occurrence suggests that participants who will gain insight may be distinguished beforehand by their individual characteristics.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The MIT Press.