J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magescas, F.
Right arrow Articles by Prablanc, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magescas, F.
Right arrow Articles by Prablanc, C.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2006;18:75-83.)
© 2006 The MIT Press

Automatic Drive of Limb Motor Plasticity

F. Magescas1,2,3 and C. Prablanc1,2,3

Unité INSERM UMRS 534 "Espace et Action," Bron cedex, France, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 UCBL1, Lyon, France, Institut Fédératif des Neurosciences de Lyon IFNL, Bron, France

Reprint requests should be sent to F. Magescas, Unité INSERM UMRS 534 "Espace et Action," 16 av du doyen Lepine, Bron cedex 69676, or via e-mail: magescas{at}lyon.inserm.fr.

The ability to perform accurate limb movements may require learning mechanisms that continually tune the motor system. In the current study, we isolate a form of pure limb motor plasticity. Participants reached to targets that were turned off just after the onset of an initial eye movement, reappearing at a new location at the end of the reaching movement. In contrast to classical prism or virtual reality paradigms, our task eliminated sensory adaptation by always maintaining a congruency between the seen and felt limb position. We also minimized awareness and potential adaptation processes on the basis of volitional strategies by progressively increasing the size of the target perturbations. In this manner, our adaptation procedure mimicked conditions used to study saccadic adaptation. The results indicated that adaptation under these conditions led to a robust after-effect that generalized to a large range of movements within the workspace. This fully natural, nonimposed generalization of adaptation is not expressed in a spatial coordinate system, but more likely in a joint-centered coordinate space.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Malfait, D. Y. Henriques, and P. L. Gribble
Shape Distortion Produced by Isolated Mismatch Between Vision and Proprioception
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 231 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. C. Simani, L. M. M. McGuire, and P. N. Sabes
Visual-Shift Adaptation Is Composed of Separable Sensory and Task-Dependent Effects
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2827 - 2841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Cheng and P. N. Sabes
Calibration of Visually Guided Reaching Is Driven by Error-Corrective Learning and Internal Dynamics
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 3057 - 3069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
C. Michel, L. Pisella, C. Prablanc, G. Rode, and Y. Rossetti
Enhancing Visuomotor Adaptation by Reducing Error Signals: Single-step (Aware) versus Multiple-step (Unaware) Exposure to Wedge Prisms.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., February 1, 2007; 19(2): 341 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The MIT Press.