J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herd, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by O'Reilly, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herd, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by O'Reilly, R. C.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2006;18:22-32.)
© 2006 The MIT Press

Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive Control: An Integrative Model of Stroop Task Performance and fMRI Data

Seth A. Herd, Marie T. Banich and Randall C. O'Reilly

University of Colorado Boulder

Reprint requests should be sent to Randall C. O'Reilly, Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Boulder, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0345, or via e-mail: oreilly{at}psych.colorado.edu.

We address the connection between conceptual knowledge and cognitive control using a neural network model. This model extends a widely held theory of cognitive control [Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing model of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361, 1990] so that it can explain new empirical findings. Leveraging other computational modeling work, we hypothesize that representations used for task control are recruited from preexisting representations for categories, such as the concept of color relevant to the Stroop task we model here. This hypothesis allows the model to account for otherwise puzzling fMRI results, such as increased activity in brain regions processing to-be-ignored information. In addition, biologically motivated changes in the model's pattern of connectivity show how global competition can arise when inhibition is strictly local, as it seems to be in the cortex. We also discuss the potential for this theory to unify models of task control with other forms of attention.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
H. Wang and J. Fan
Human attentional networks: a connectionist model.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., October 1, 2007; 19(10): 1678 - 1689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The MIT Press.