J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laws, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sartori, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laws, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sartori, G.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2005;17:1453-1459.)
© 2005 The MIT Press

Category Deficits and Paradoxical Dissociations in Alzheimer's Disease and Herpes Simplex Encephalitis

Keith R. Laws1,* and Giuseppe Sartori2

1 Nottingham Trent University, UK, 2 University of Padua, Italy

Reprint requests should be sent to Dr. Keith R. Laws, School of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB, UK, or via e-mail: keith.laws@ntu.ac.uk.

Most studies examining category specificity are single-case studies of patients with living or nonliving deficits. Nevertheless, no explicit or agreed criteria exist for establishing category-specific deficits in single cases regarding the type of analyses, whether to compare with healthy controls, the number of tasks, or the type of tasks. We examined two groups of patients with neurological pathology frequently accompanied by impaired semantic memory (19 patients with Alzheimer's disease and 15 with Herpes Simplex Encephalitis). Category knowledge was examined using three tasks (picture naming, naming-to-description, and feature verification). Both patient groups were compared with age- and education-matched healthy controls. The profile in each patient was examined for consistency across tasks and across different analyses; however, both proved to be inconsistent. One striking finding was the presence of paradoxical dissociations (i.e., patients who were impaired for living things on one task and nonliving things on another task). The findings have significant implications for how we determine category effects and, more generally, for the methods used to document double dissociations across individual cases in this literature.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
K. Hoenig, E.-J. Sim, V. Bochev, B. Herrnberger, and M. Kiefer
Conceptual Flexibility in the Human Brain: Dynamic Recruitment of Semantic Maps from Visual, Motor, and Motion-related Areas
J. Cogn. Neurosci., October 1, 2008; 20(10): 1799 - 1814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
R. Zahn, P. Garrard, J. Talazko, M. Gondan, P. Bubrowski, F. Juengling, H. Slawik, P. Dykierek, B. Koester, and M. Hull
Patterns of Regional Brain Hypometabolism Associated with Knowledge of Semantic Features and Categories in Alzheimer's Disease
J. Cogn. Neurosci., December 1, 2006; 18(12): 2138 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The MIT Press.