| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Duke University
Reprint requests should be sent to Marty G. Woldorff, Duke University, Box 90999, LSRC-Bldg., Room D203, Durham, NC 27708-0999, or via e-mail: woldorff{at}duke.edu.
We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to evaluate the role of attention in the integration of visual and auditory features of multisensory objects. This was done by contrasting the ERPs to multisensory stimuli (AV) to the sum of the ERPs to the corresponding auditory-only (A) and visual-only (V) stimuli [i.e., AV vs. (A + V)]. V, A, and VA stimuli were presented in random order to the left and right hemispaces. Subjects attended to a designated side to detect infrequent target stimuli in either modality there. The focus of this report is on the ERPs to the standard (i.e., nontarget) stimuli. We used rapid variable stimulus onset asynchronies (350–650 msec) to mitigate anticipatory activity and included "no-stim" trials to estimate and remove ERP overlap from residual anticipatory processes and from adjacent stimuli in the sequence. Spatial attention effects on the processing of the unisensory stimuli consisted of a modulation of visual P1 and N1 components (at 90–130 msec and 160–200 msec, respectively) and of the auditory N1 and processing negativity (100–200 msec). Attended versus unattended multisensory ERPs elicited a combination of these effects. Multisensory integration effects consisted of an initial frontal positivity around 100 msec that was larger for attended stimuli. This was followed by three phases of centro-medially distributed effects of integration and/or attention beginning at around 160 msec, and peaking at 190 (scalp positivity), 250 (negativity), and 300–500 msec (positivity) after stimulus onset. These integration effects were larger in amplitude for attended than for unattended stimuli, providing neural evidence that attention can modulate multisensory-integration processes at multiple stages.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Hocking and C. J. Price The Role of the Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus in Audiovisual Processing Cereb Cortex, February 14, 2008; (2008) bhn007v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Fan, J. Byrne, M. S. Worden, K. G. Guise, B. D. McCandliss, J. Fossella, and M. I. Posner The Relation of Brain Oscillations to Attentional Networks J. Neurosci., June 6, 2007; 27(23): 6197 - 6206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Mishra, A. Martinez, T. J. Sejnowski, and S. A. Hillyard Early Cross-Modal Interactions in Auditory and Visual Cortex Underlie a Sound-Induced Visual Illusion J. Neurosci., April 11, 2007; 27(15): 4120 - 4131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Talsma, T. J. Doty, and M. G. Woldorff Selective Attention and Audiovisual Integration: Is Attending to Both Modalities a Prerequisite for Early Integration? Cereb Cortex, March 1, 2007; 17(3): 679 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Yuval-Greenberg and L. Y. Deouell What You See Is Not (Always) What You Hear: Induced Gamma Band Responses Reflect Cross-Modal Interactions in Familiar Object Recognition J. Neurosci., January 31, 2007; 27(5): 1090 - 1096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Senkowski, S. Molholm, M. Gomez-Ramirez, and J. J. Foxe Oscillatory Beta Activity Predicts Response Speed during a Multisensory Audiovisual Reaction Time Task: A High-Density Electrical Mapping Study Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2006; 16(11): 1556 - 1565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| NEURAL COMPUTATION | J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE | MIT PRESS JOURNALS |
