J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zivotofsky, A. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zivotofsky, A. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, K. D.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2005;17:1011-1017.)
© 2005 The MIT Press

Rhesus Monkeys Behave As If They Perceive the Duncker Illusion

A. Z. Zivotofsky1,2, M. E. Goldberg1,3,4 and K. D. Powell1,5

1 National Eye Institute, Bethesda, 2 Bar Ilan University, 3 Columbia University, 4 The New York State Psychiatric Institute, 5 University of Illinois at Chicago

Reprint requests should be sent to Ari Z. Zivotofsky, PhD, Gonda Brain Science Program, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 52900, Israel, or via e-mail: zivotoa{at}mail.biu.ac.il.

The visual system uses the pattern of motion on the retina to analyze the motion of objects in the world, and the motion of the observer him/herself. Distinguishing between retinal motion evoked by movement of the retina in space and retinal motion evoked by movement of objects in the environment is computationally difficult, and the human visual system frequently misinterprets the meaning of retinal motion. In this study, we demonstrate that the visual system of the Rhesus monkey also misinterprets retinal motion. We show that monkeys erroneously report the trajectories of pursuit targets or their own pursuit eye movements during an epoch of smooth pursuit across an orthogonally moving background. Furthermore, when they make saccades to the spatial location of stimuli that flashed early in an epoch of smooth pursuit or fixation, they make large errors that appear to take into account the erroneous smooth eye movement that they report in the first experiment, and not the eye movement that they actually make.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The MIT Press.