HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fellows, L. K. Articles by Wu, D. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fellows, L. K. Articles by Wu, D. H.

Method Matters: An Empirical Study of Impact in Cognitive Neuroscience

¹ University of Pennsylvania, ² Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, ³ California State University Dominguez Hills

Reprint request should be sent to Lesley K. Fellows, Montreal Neurological Institute, 3801 University Street, Rm. 276, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 2B4, or via e-mail: lesley.fellows{at}mcgill.ca.

A major thrust of cognitive neuroscience is the elucidation of structure–function relationships in the human brain. Over the last several years, functional neuroimaging has risen in prominence relative to the lesion studies that formed the historical core of work in this field. These two methods have different strengths and weaknesses. Among these is a crucial difference in the nature of evidence each can provide. Lesion studies can provide evidence for necessity claims, whereas functional neuroimaging studies do not. We hypothesized that lesion studies will continue to have greater scientific impact even as the relative proportion of such studies in the cognitive neuroscience literature declines. Using methods drawn from systematic literature review, we identified a set of original cognitive neuroscience articles that employed either functional imaging or lesion techniques, published at one of two time points in the 1990s, and assessed the effect of the method used on each article's impact across the decade. Functional neuroimaging studies were cited three times more often than lesion studies throughout the time span we examined. This effect was in large part due to differences in the influence of the journals publishing the two methods; functional neuroimaging studies appeared disproportionately more often in higher impact journals. There were also differences in the degree to which articles using one method cited articles using the other method. Functional neuroimaging articles were less likely to include such cross-method citations.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. K. Fellows, M. Stark, A. Berg, and A. Chatterjee Patient registries in cognitive neuroscience research: advantages, challenges, and practical advice. J. Cogn. Neurosci., June 1, 2008; 20(6): 1107 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Y. Kimberg, H. B. Coslett, and M. F. Schwartz Power in Voxel-based Lesion-Symptom Mapping. J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2007; 19(7): 1067 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Rorden, H.-O. Karnath, and L. Bonilha Improving lesion-symptom mapping. J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2007; 19(7): 1081 - 1088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Cools, R. B. Ivry, and M. D'Esposito The Human Striatum is Necessary for Responding to Changes in Stimulus Relevance J. Cogn. Neurosci., December 1, 2006; 18(12): 1973 - 1983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Hillis, J. T. Kleinman, M. Newhart, J. Heidler-Gary, R. Gottesman, P. B. Barker, E. Aldrich, R. Llinas, R. Wityk, and P. Chaudhry Restoring Cerebral Blood Flow Reveals Neural Regions Critical for Naming J. Neurosci., August 2, 2006; 26(31): 8069 - 8073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]