J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruz, M.
Right arrow Articles by McCandliss, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruz, M.
Right arrow Articles by McCandliss, B. D.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2005;17:768-776.)
© 2005 The MIT Press

Inattentional Amnesia to Words in a High Attentional Load Task

María Ruz1,2, Michael S. Worden1, Pío Tudela2 and Bruce D. McCandliss1

1 Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 2 Universidad de Granada, Spain

Reprint requests should be sent to Bruce McCandliss, Sackler Institute, Box 140, 1300 York Ave., New York, NY 10021, or via e-mail: bdm2001{at}med.cornell.edu.

We investigated the dependence of visual word processes on attention by examining event-related potential (ERP) responses as subjects viewed words while their attention was engaged by a concurrent highly demanding task. We used a paradigm from a previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment [Rees, G., Russel, C., Frith, C.D., & Driver, J. Inattentional blindness vs. inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. Science, 286, 2504–2506, 1999] in which participants attended either to drawings or to overlapping letters (words or nonwords) presented at a fast rate. Although previous fMRI results supported the notion that word processing was obliterated by attention withdrawal, the current electrophysiological results demonstrated that visual words are processed even under conditions in which attentional resources are engaged in a different task that does not involve reading. In two experiments, ERPs for attended words versus nonwords differed in the left frontal, left posterior, and medial scalp locations. However, in contrast to the previous fMRI results, ERPs responded differentially to ignored words and consonant strings in several regions. These results suggest that fMRI and ERPs may have differential sensitivity to some forms of neural activation. Moreover, they provide evidence to restore the notion that the brain analyzes words even when attention is tied to another dimension.


Key Words: Attention • word recognition • perceptual load • imaging techniques • HDERPs




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M. Ruz and A. C. Nobre
Attention Modulates Initial Stages of Visual Word Processing
J. Cogn. Neurosci., September 1, 2008; 20(9): 1727 - 1736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
T. C. Cristescu and A. C. Nobre
Differential modulation of word recognition by semantic and spatial orienting of attention.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., May 1, 2008; 20(5): 787 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The MIT Press.