J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Price, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Price, C.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2005;17:434-445.)
© 2005 The MIT Press

Fusiform Activation to Animals is Driven by the Process, Not the Stimulus

Timothy T. Rogers1,2, Julia Hocking3, Andrea Mechelli3, Karalyn Patterson1 and Cathy Price3

1 MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences, Cambridge
2 University of Wisconsin–Madison
3 Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience

Previous studies have found that the lateral posterior fusiform gyri respond more robustly to pictures of animals than pictures of manmade objects and suggested that these regions encode the visual properties characteristic of animals. We suggest that such effects actually reflect processing demands arising when items with similar representations must be finely discriminated. In a positron emission tomography (PET) study of category verification with colored photographs of animals and vehicles, there was robust animal-specific activation in the lateral posterior fusiform gyri when stimuli were categorized at an intermediate level of specificity (e.g., dog or car). However, when the same photographs were categorized at a more specific level (e.g., Labrador or BMW), these regions responded equally strongly to animals and vehicles. We conclude that the lateral posterior fusiform does not encode domain-specific representations of animals or visual properties characteristic of animals. Instead, these regions are strongly activated whenever an item must be discriminated from many close visual or semantic competitors. Apparent category effects arise because, at an intermediate level of specificity, animals have more visual and semantic competitors than do artifacts.


Key Words: Categorization • category specificity • functional imaging • fusiform gyrus • PET • semantic knowledge




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
X. Liu, N. A. Steinmetz, A. B. Farley, C. D. Smith, and J. E. Joseph
Mid-fusiform Activation during Object Discrimination Reflects the Process of Differentiating Structural Descriptions
J. Cogn. Neurosci., September 1, 2008; 20(9): 1711 - 1726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
C. Gerlach
A review of functional imaging studies on category specificity.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., February 1, 2007; 19(2): 296 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The MIT Press.