J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crosson, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez Rothi, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crosson, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez Rothi, L. J.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2005;17:392-406.)
© 2005 The MIT Press

Role of the Right and Left Hemispheres in Recovery of Function during Treatment of Intention in Aphasia

Bruce Crosson1,2,3, Anna Bacon Moore1,2,3, Kaundinya Gopinath4, Keith D. White2, Christina E. Wierenga1,2, Megan E. Gaiefsky2, Katherine S. Fabrizio2, Kyung K. Peck2, David Soltysik2, Christina Milsted2, Richard W. Briggs4, Tim W. Conway1 and Leslie J. Gonzalez Rothi1,2,3

1 Malcom Randall Veterans Affairs Medical Center
2 University of Florida
3 McKnight Brain Institute
4 University of Texas Southwestern Medical School

Two patients with residual nonfluent aphasia after ischemic stroke received an intention treatment that was designed to shift intention and language production mechanisms from the frontal lobe of the damaged left hemisphere to the right frontal lobe. Consistent with experimental hypotheses, the first patient showed improvement on the intention treatment but not on a similar attention treatment. In addition, in keeping with experimental hypotheses, the patient showed a shift of activity to right presupplementary motor area and the right lateral frontal lobe from pre- to post-intention treatment functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of language production. In contrast, the second patient showed improvement on both the intention and attention treatments. During pre-treatment fMRI, she already showed lateralization of intention and language production mechanisms to the right hemisphere that continued into post-intention treatment imaging. From pre- to post-treatment fMRI of language production, both patients demonstrated increased activity in the posterior perisylvian cortex, although this activity was lateralized to left-hemisphere language areas in the second but not the first patient. The fact that the first patient's lesion encompassed almost all of the dominant basal ganglia and thalamus whereas the second patient's lesion spared these structures suggests that the dominant basal ganglia could play a role in spontaneous reorganization of language production functions to the right hemisphere. Implications regarding the theoretical framework for the intention treatment are discussed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Richter, W. H. R. Miltner, and T. Straube
Association between therapy outcome and right-hemispheric activation in chronic aphasia
Brain, May 1, 2008; 131(5): 1391 - 1401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
A. M. Raymer, P. Beeson, A. Holland, D. Kendall, L. M. Maher, N. Martin, L. Murray, M. Rose, C. K. Thompson, L. Turkstra, et al.
Translational Research in Aphasia: From Neuroscience to Neurorehabilitation
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2008; 51(1): S259 - S275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
P. Vitali, J. Abutalebi, M. Tettamanti, M. Danna, A.-I. Ansaldo, D. Perani, Y. Joanette, and S. F. Cappa
Training-Induced Brain Remapping in Chronic Aphasia: A Pilot Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2007; 21(2): 152 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The MIT Press.