J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rekkas, P. V.
Right arrow Articles by Constable, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rekkas, P. V.
Right arrow Articles by Constable, R. T.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2005;17:1950-1961.)
© 2005 The MIT Press

Evidence That Autobiographic Memory Retrieval Does Not Become Independent of the Hippocampus: An fMRI Study Contrasting Very Recent with Remote Events

P. V. Rekkas and R. Todd Constable

Yale University

Reprint requests should be sent to P. V. Rekkas, Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, TAC MRRC N127, P.O. Box 208042, New Haven, CT 06520-8042, or via e-mail: vivien.rekkas{at}yale.edu.

Traditional consolidation theory, which seeks to explain how new memories are incorporated into the preexisting neural architecture, stipulates that the hippocampus plays a time-limited role in this process. However, although there is abundant research showing that the hippocampus is necessary for the initial (encoding) phase, there is very little experimental evidence with human subjects proving that the structure ceases to play a role in the retrieval of episodic items from memory stores. To test this hypothesis, we investigated recall activation associated with recent memories (2.5 days) versus remote memories (mean of 8 years) using functional magnetic resonance imaging. In accordance with the multiple memory trace theory, recall of consolidated autobiographic information, represented by the remote condition, was not independent of the hippocampus. Both types of memory retrieval produced significant activation in parahippocampal, prefrontal, and midtemporal gyri, the parietal–temporal junction, and a medial region of cortex spanning the posterior cingulate and precuneus gyri. However, where recent events activated bilateral regions of the caudate nucleus, remote events yielded significantly greater activation within the hippocampus proper. The results challenge traditional consolidation theory, which would predict greater hippocampal activity for recent events. Furthermore, they highlight the interplay between multiple memory systems in the brain. We argue that our particular question format, which encouraged depth of recall and did not require a prescan interview, as well as our delineation of the recent and remote time periods, were the determining factors for the observed pattern of hippocampal activation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
D. R. Addis, M. Moscovitch, and M. P. McAndrews
Consequences of hippocampal damage across the autobiographical memory network in left temporal lobe epilepsy
Brain, September 1, 2007; 130(9): 2327 - 2342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
J. L. Woodard, M. Seidenberg, K. A. Nielson, S. K. Miller, M. Franczak, P. Antuono, K. L. Douville, and S. M. Rao
Temporally graded activation of neocortical regions in response to memories of different ages.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2007; 19(7): 1113 - 1124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The MIT Press.