HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vogel, E. K. Articles by Luck, S. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vogel, E. K. Articles by Luck, S. J.

Pushing around the Locus of Selection: Evidence for the Flexible-selection Hypothesis

¹ University of Oregon, ² Vanderbilt University, ³ University of Iowa

Reprint requests should be sent to Edward K. Vogel, Department of Psychology, 1227 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1227, or via e-mail: vogel{at}darkwing.uoregon.edu.

Attention operates at an early stage in some experimental paradigms and at a late stage in others, which suggests that the locus of selection is flexible. The present study was designed to determine whether the locus of selection can vary flexibly within a single experimental paradigm as a function of relatively modest variations in stimulus and task parameters. In the first experiment, a new method for assessing the locus of selection was developed. Specifically, attention can influence perceptual encoding only if it is directed to the target before a perceptual representation of the target has been formed, whereas attention can influence postperceptual processes even if attention is cued after perception is complete. Event-related potentials were used to confirm the validity of this method. The subsequent experiments used cueing tasks in which subjects were required to perceive and remember a set of objects, and the difficulty of the perception and memory components of the task were varied. When the task overloaded perception but not working memory, attention influenced the formation of perceptual representations but not the storage of these representations in memory; when the task overloaded working memory but not perception, attention influenced the transfer of perceptual representations into memory but not the formation of the perceptual representations. Thus, attention operates to select relevant information at whatever stage or stages of processing are overloaded by a particular stimulus–task combination.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. SanMiguel, M.-J. Corral, and C. Escera When Loading Working Memory Reduces Distraction: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence from an Auditory-Visual Distraction Paradigm J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2008; 20(7): 1131 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Kelly, M. Gomez-Ramirez, and J. J. Foxe Spatial Attention Modulates Initial Afferent Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex Cereb Cortex, March 4, 2008; (2008) bhn022v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Giesbrecht, J. L. Sy, and J. C. Elliott Electrophysiological Evidence for Both Perceptual and Postperceptual Selection during the Attentional Blink. J. Cogn. Neurosci., December 1, 2007; 19(12): 2005 - 2018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]