J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirchhoff, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Buckner, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirchhoff, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Buckner, R. L.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2005;17:1841-1854.)
© 2005 The MIT Press

Orthographic Distinctiveness and Semantic Elaboration Provide Separate Contributions to Memory

Brenda A. Kirchhoff1, Melissa L. Schapiro1 and Randy L. Buckner1,2

1 Washington University, 2 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, St. Louis, MO

Reprint requests should be sent to Brenda A. Kirchhoff, Washington University, Psychology Department, Campus Box 1125, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, or via e-mail: bkirchho{at}artsci.wustl.edu.

Orthographic distinctiveness and semantic elaboration both enhance memory. The present behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies examined the relationship between the influences of orthographic distinctiveness and semantic elaboration on memory, and explored whether they make independent contributions. As is typical for manipulations of processing levels, words studied during semantic encoding were better remembered than words studied during nonsemantic encoding. Notably, orthographically distinct words were better recalled and received more remember responses on recognition memory tests than orthographically common words regardless of encoding task, suggesting that orthographic distinctiveness has an additive effect to that of semantic elaboration on memory. In the fMRI study, orthographic distinctiveness and semantic elaboration engaged separate networks of brain regions. Semantic elaboration modulated activity in left inferior prefrontal and lateral temporal regions. In contrast, orthographic distinctiveness modulated activity in distinct bilateral inferior prefrontal, extrastriate, and parietal regions. Orthographic distinctiveness and semantic elaboration appear to have separate behavioral and functional–anatomic contributions to memory.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
R. L. BUCKNER, J. R. ANDREWS-HANNA, and D. L. SCHACTER
The Brain's Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., March 1, 2008; 1124(1): 1 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
R. J. Garoff-Eaton, E. A. Kensinger, and D. L. Schacter
The neural correlates of conceptual and perceptual false recognition
Learn. Mem., October 1, 2007; 14(10): 684 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The MIT Press.