J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barber, H.
Right arrow Articles by Carreiras, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barber, H.
Right arrow Articles by Carreiras, M.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2005;17:137-153.)
© 2005 The MIT Press

Grammatical Gender and Number Agreement in Spanish: An ERP Comparison

Horacio Barber

University of California

Manuel Carreiras

Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain

The role of grammatical gender and number representations in syntactic processes during reading in Spanish was studied using the event-related potentials (ERPs) technique. The electroencephalogram was recorded with a dense array of 128 electrodes while Spanish speakers read word pairs (Experiment 1) or sentences (Experiment 2) in which gender or number agreement relationships were manipulated. Disagreement in word pairs formed by a noun and an adjective (e.g., faro–alto [lighthouse–high]) produced an N400-type effect, while word pairs formed by an article and a noun (e.g., el–piano [the-piano]) showed an additional left anterior negativity effect (LAN). Agreement violations with the same words inserted in sentences (e.g., El piano estaba viejo y desafinado [the m-s piano m-s was old m-s and off-key]) resulted in a pattern of LAN–P600. This effect was found both when the violation occurred in the middle of the sentence (at the adjective), as well as when this happened at the beginning of the sentence (at the noun), but the last segment of the P600 effect was greater for the middle sentence position, which could indicate differences in the complexity of reanalysis processes. Differences between grammatical gender and number disagreement were found in late measures. In the word pairs experiment, P3 peak latency varied across conditions, being later for gender than for number disagreement. Similarly, in the sentence experiment, the last segment of the P600 effect was greater for gender than for number violations. These event-related potentials (ERPs) effects lend support to the idea that reanalysis or repair processes after grammatical disagreement detection could involve more steps in the case of gender disagreement, as grammatical gender is a feature of the lexical representation in contrast to number, which is considered a morphological feature that combines with the stem of the word.


Key Words: ERP • LAN • N400 • P3 • P600 • grammatical gender and number agreement




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mem CognitHome page
S. VAINIO, J. HYONA, and A. PAJUNEN
Processing modifier-head agreement in reading: Evidence for a delayed effect of agreement
Mem Cognit, March 1, 2008; 36(2): 329 - 340.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
E. Service, P. Helenius, S. Maury, and R. Salmelin
Localization of Syntactic and Semantic Brain Responses using Magnetoencephalography.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2007; 19(7): 1193 - 1205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
F. Pulvermuller and R. Assadollahi
Grammar or serial order?: discrete combinatorial brain mechanisms reflected by the syntactic mismatch negativity.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., June 1, 2007; 19(6): 971 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The MIT Press.