J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grealy, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grealy, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, S. G.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2004;16:1185-1195.)
© 2004 The MIT Press

Judging Time Intervals Using a Model of Perceptuo-Motor Control

Madeleine A. Grealy1, Cathy M. Craig2, Christophe Bourdin and Simon G. Coleman3

1 University of Strathclyde, 2 Université de la Méditerranée 3 University of Edinburgh

Estimating a time interval and temporally coordinating movements in space are fundamental skills, but the relationships between these different forms of timing, and the neural processes that they incur, are not well understood. While different theories have been proposed to account for time perception, time estimation, and the temporal patterns of coordination, there are no general mechanisms which unify these various timing skills. This study considers whether a model of perceptuo-motor timing, the {tau}GUIDE, can also describe how certain judgements of elapsed time are made. To evaluate this, an equation for determining interval estimates was derived from the {tau}GUIDE model and tested in a task where participants had to throw a ball and estimate when it would hit the floor. The results showed that in accordance with the model, very accurate judgements could be made without vision (mean timing error –19.24 msec), and the model was a good predictor of skilled participants' estimate timing. It was concluded that since the {tau}GUIDE principle provides temporal information in a generic form, it could be a unitary process that links different forms of timing.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Zago and F. Lacquaniti
Internal Model of Gravity for Hand Interception: Parametric Adaptation to Zero-Gravity Visual Targets on Earth
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1346 - 1357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by The MIT Press.