HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tyler, L. K. Articles by Marslen-Wilson, W. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tyler, L. K. Articles by Marslen-Wilson, W. D.

Deficits for Semantics and the Irregular Past Tense: A Causal Relationship?

¹ University of Cambridge, ² MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, ³ Research Institute for Care of the Elderly, University of Cambridge

The regular and irregular past tense has become a focus for recent debates about the structure of the language processing system, asking whether language functions are subserved by different neural and functional mechanisms or whether all processes can be accommodated within a single unified system. A critical claim of leading single mechanism accounts is that the relationship between an irregular stem and its past tense form is primarily semantic and not morphological in nature. This predicts an obligatory relationship between semantic performance and access to the irregular past tense, such that a semantic deficit necessarily leads to impairments on the irregulars. We tested this claim in a series of studies probing the comprehension and production of regular and irregular past tense forms in four semantic dementia patients, all of whom had profound semantic deficits. In two elicitation tasks and one auditory priming study, we found that three out of the four patients did not have a deficit for the irregular past tense, in spite of their semantic deficits. This argues against the view that the relationship between irregular past tense forms and their stems is primarily semantic, and more generally against the single system claim that morphological structure can be captured solely based on phonological and semantic relationships.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. JUSTUS, J. LARSEN, P. D. M. DAVIES, and D. SWICK Interpreting dissociations between regular and irregular past-tense morphology: Evidence from event-related potentials Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, June 1, 2008; 8(2): 178 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. K. Tyler, W. D. Marslen-Wilson, and E. A. Stamatakis Differentiating lexical form, meaning, and structure in the neural language system PNAS, June 7, 2005; 102(23): 8375 - 8380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]