J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Carter, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Carter, C. S.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2004;16:637-653.)
© 2004 The MIT Press

The Relationship of Three Cortical Regions to an Information-Processing Model

John R. Anderson and Yulin Qin

Carnegie Mellon University

V. Andrew Stenger and Cameron S. Carter

University of Pittsburgh

This research tests a model of the computational role of three cortical regions in tasks like algebra equation solving. The model assumes that there is a left parietal region-of-interest (ROI) where the problem expression is represented and transformed, a left prefrontal ROI where information for solving the task is retrieved, and a motor ROI where hand movements to produce the answer are programmed. A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of an abstract symbol-manipulation task was performed to articulate the roles of these three regions. Participants learned to associate words with instructions for transforming strings of letters. The study manipulated the need to retrieve these instructions, the need to transform the strings, and whether there was a delay between calculation of the answer and the output of the answer. As predicted, the left parietal ROI mainly reflected the need for a transformation and the left prefrontal ROI the need for retrieval. Homologous right ROIs showed similar but weaker responses. Neither the prefrontal nor the parietal ROIs responded to delay, but the motor ROI did respond to delay, implying motor rehearsal over the delay. Except for the motor ROI, these patterns of activity did not vary with response hand. In an ACT-R model, it was shown that the activity of an imaginal buffer predicted the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response of the parietal ROI, the activity of a retrieval buffer predicted the response of the prefrontal ROI, and the activity of a manual buffer predicted the response of the motor ROI.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. R. Anderson, D. Byrne, J. M. Fincham, and P. Gunn
Role of Prefrontal and Parietal Cortices in Associative Learning
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2008; 18(4): 904 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
D. Badre and M. D'Esposito
Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a hierarchical organization of the prefrontal cortex.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., December 1, 2007; 19(12): 2082 - 2099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. M. Fincham and J. R. Anderson
Distinct roles of the anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in the acquisition and performance of a cognitive skill
PNAS, August 22, 2006; 103(34): 12941 - 12946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by The MIT Press.