HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hodgson, T. L. Articles by Kennard, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hodgson, T. L. Articles by Kennard, C.

Eye Movements during Task Switching: Reflexive, Symbolic, and Affective Contributions to Response Selection

University of Exeter

Charlotte Golding, Dimitra Molyva, Clive R. Rosenthal and Christopher Kennard

Imperial College

Active vision is a dynamic process involving the flexible coordination of different gaze strategies to achieve behavioral goals. Although many complex behaviors rely on an ability to efficiently switch between gaze-control strategies, few studies to date have examined mechanisms of task level oculomotor control in detail. Here, we report five experiments in which subjects alternated between conflicting stimulus–saccade mappings within a block of trials. The first experiment showed that there is no performance cost associated with switching between pro and anti saccades. However, follow-up experiments demonstrate that whenever subjects alternate between arbitrary stimulus–saccade mappings, latency costs are apparent on the first trial after a task change. More detailed analysis of switch costs showed that latencies were particularly elevated for saccades directed toward the same location that had been the target for a saccade on the preceeding trial. This saccade "inhibition of return" effect was most marked when unexpected error feedbacks cued task switches, suggesting that saccade selection processes are modulated by reward. We conclude that there are two systems for saccade control that differ in their characteristics following a task switch. The "reflexive" control system can be enabled/disabled in advance of saccade execution without incurring any performance cost. Switch costs are only observed when two or more arbitrary stimulus–saccade mappings have to be coordinated by a "symbolic" control system.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Hodgson, M. Chamberlain, B. Parris, M. James, N. Gutowski, M. Husain, and C. Kennard The role of the ventrolateral frontal cortex in inhibitory oculomotor control Brain, June 1, 2007; 130(6): 1525 - 1537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Parris, N. J. Thai, A. Benattayallah, I. R. Summers, and T. L. Hodgson The role of the lateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate in stimulus-response association reversals. J. Cogn. Neurosci., January 1, 2007; 19(1): 13 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Sinha, J.T.G. Brown, and R.H.S. Carpenter Task Switching as a Two-Stage Decision Process J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 3146 - 3153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]