J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eimer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Driver, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eimer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Driver, J.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2004;16:272-288.)
© 2004 The MIT Press

ERP Evidence for Cross-Modal Audiovisual Effects of Endogenous Spatial Attention within Hemifields

Martin Eimer and José van Velzen

Birkbeck College London

Jon Driver

University College London

Previous ERP studies have uncovered cross-modal interactions in endogenous spatial attention. Directing attention to one side to judge stimuli from one particular modality can modulate early modality-specific ERP components not only for that modality, but also for other currently irrelevant modalities. However, past studies could not determine whether the spatial focus of attention in the task-irrelevant secondary modality was similar to the primary modality, or was instead diffuse across one hemifield. Here, auditory or visual stimuli could appear at any one of four locations (two on each side). In different blocks, subjects judged stimuli at only one of these four locations, for an auditory (Experiment 1) or visual (Experiment 2) task. Early attentional modulations of visual and auditory ERPs were found for stimuli at the currently relevant location, compared with those at the irrelevant location within the same hemifield, thus demonstrating within-hemifield tuning of spatial attention. Crucially, this was found not only for the currently relevant modality, but also for the currently irrelevant modality. Moreover, these within-hemifield attention effects were statistically equivalent regardless of the task relevance of the modality, for both the auditory and visual ERP data. These results demonstrate that within-hemifield spatial attention for one task-relevant modality can transfer cross-modally to a task-irrelevant modality, consistent with spatial selection at a multimodal level of representation.


Key Words: Visual–spatial attention • Auditory–spatial attention • Cross-modal attention • Event-related brain potentials




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Percept PsychophysHome page
W. E. HUDDLESTON, J. W. LEWIS, R. E. PHINNEY JR., and E. A. DEYOE
Auditory and visual attention-based apparent motion share functional parallels
Percept Psychophys, October 1, 2008; 70(7): 1207 - 1216.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. M. Ciaramitaro, G. T. Buracas, and G. M. Boynton
Spatial and Cross-Modal Attention Alter Responses to Unattended Sensory Information in Early Visual and Auditory Human Cortex
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2399 - 2413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Kida, K. Inui, T. Wasaka, K. Akatsuka, E. Tanaka, and R. Kakigi
Time-Varying Cortical Activations Related to Visual-Tactile Cross-Modal Links in Spatial Selective Attention
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3585 - 3596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
T. M. Van Vleet and L. C. Robertson
Cross-modal Interactions in Time and Space: Auditory Influence on Visual Attention in Hemispatial Neglect.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., August 1, 2006; 18(8): 1368 - 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by The MIT Press.