HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Morland, A. B. Articles by Pambakian, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Morland, A. B. Articles by Pambakian, A.

The Role of Spared Calcarine Cortex and Lateral Occipital Cortex in the Responses of Human Hemianopes to Visual Motion

Royal Holloway University of London

Sandra Lê

Royal Holloway University of London
Current address: INSERM U455, Service of Neurology, CHU Purpan, F-31059 Toulouse Cedex 3, France.

Erin Carroll and Michael B. Hoffmann

Royal Holloway University of London

Alidz Pambakian

Imperial College School of Medicine

Some patients, who are rendered perimetrically blind in one hemifield by cortical lesions, nevertheless exhibit residual visual capacities within their field defects. The neural mechanism that mediates the residual visual responses has remained the topic of considerable debate. One explanation posits the subcortical visual pathways that bypass the primary visual cortex and innervate the extrastriate visual areas as the substrate that underlies the residual vision. The other explanation is that small islands of the primary visual cortex remain intact and provide the signals for residual vision. We have performed behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments to investigate the validity of the two explanations of residual vision. Our behavioral experiments indicated that of the seven hemianopes tested, two had the ability to discriminate the direction of a drifting grating. This residual visual response was shown with fMRI to be the result of spared islands of calcarine cortical activity in one of the hemianopes, whereas only lateral occipital activity was documented in the other patient. These results indicate that the underlying neural correlates of residual vision can vary between patients. Moreover, our study emphasizes the necessity of ruling out the presence of islands of preserved function and primary visual cortex before assigning residual visual capacities to the properties of visual pathways that bypass the primary visual cortex.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Bridge, O. Thomas, S. Jbabdi, and A. Cowey Changes in connectivity after visual cortical brain damage underlie altered visual function Brain, June 1, 2008; 131(6): 1433 - 1444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Rees The anatomy of blindsight Brain, June 1, 2008; 131(6): 1414 - 1415. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L Henriksson, A Raninen, R Nasanen, L Hyvarinen, and S Vanni Training-induced cortical representation of a hemianopic hemifield J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2007; 78(1): 74 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]