HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rhodes, G. Articles by Puce, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rhodes, G. Articles by Puce, A.

Is the Fusiform Face Area Specialized for Faces, Individuation, or Expert Individuation?

University of Western Australia

Patricia T. Michie

University of Western Australia
University of Newcastle Australia

Aina Puce

Swinburne University of Technology
Austin & Repatriation Medical Centre
West Virginia University

Several brain imaging studies have identified a region of fusiform gyrus (FG) that responds more strongly to faces than common objects. The precise functional role of this fusiform face area (FFA) is, however, a matter of dispute. We sought to distinguish among three hypotheses concerning FFA function: face specificity, individuation, and expert individuation. According to the face-specificity hypothesis, the FFA is specialized for face processing. Alternatively, the FFA may be specialized for individuating visually similar items within a category (the individuation hypothesis) or for individuating within categories with which a person has expertise (the expert-individuation hypothesis). Our results from two experiments supported the face-specificity hypothesis. Greater FFA activation to faces than Lepidoptera, another homogeneous object class, occurred during both free viewing and individuation, with similar FFA activation to Lepidoptera and common objects (Experiment 1). Furthermore, during individuation of Lepidoptera, 83% of activated FG voxels were outside the face FG region and only 15% of face FG voxels were activated. This pattern of results suggests that distinct areas may individuate faces and Lepidoptera. In Experiment 2, we tested Lepidoptera experts using the same experimental design. Again, the results supported the face-specificity hypothesis. Activation to faces in the FFA was greater than to both Lepidoptera and objects with little overlap between FG areas activated by faces and Lepidoptera. Our results suggest that distinct populations of neurons in human FG may be tuned to the features needed to individuate the members of different object classes, as has been reported in monkey inferotemporal cortex, and that the FFA contains neurons tuned for individuating faces.

Key Words: fusiform gyrus • faces • objects • Lepidoptera • individuation • expertise

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Kriegeskorte, E. Formisano, B. Sorger, and R. Goebel Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20600 - 20605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-C. Kung, J. J. Peissig, and M. J. Tarr Is Region-of-Interest Overlap Comparison a Reliable Measure of Category Specificity? J. Cogn. Neurosci., December 1, 2007; 19(12): 2019 - 2034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Moore, M. X. Cohen, and C. Ranganath Neural Mechanisms of Expert Skills in Visual Working Memory J. Neurosci., October 25, 2006; 26(43): 11187 - 11196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Xu Revisiting the Role of the Fusiform Face Area in Visual Expertise Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2005; 15(8): 1234 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Behrmann, J. Marotta, I. Gauthier, M. J. Tarr, and T. J. McKeeff Behavioral Change and Its Neural Correlates in Visual Agnosia After Expertise Training J. Cogn. Neurosci., April 1, 2005; 17(4): 554 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]