|
|
||||||||
University of Western Ontario
Paus
McGill University
Washington University
McGill University
Successful recovery of words from episodic memory relies strongly on semantic processes at the time of encoding. Evidence from several functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies has shown that changes in neural activity in the left inferior prefrontal cortex (LIPFC) during semantic encoding predict subsequent memory performance. This evidence has been taken to suggest that LIPFC plays a critical role in memory formation. Functional neuroimaging findings, however, do not establish a causal brainbehavior relationship. To determine whether there is a causal link between LIPFC involvement at encoding and subsequent success in memory performance, we conducted a two-part study in which we first used fMRI to localize encoding-related activation in LIPFC and then employed repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to manipulate neural processes in LIPFC during semantic encoding. To demonstrate the neuroanatomical specificity of any observed effect and to control for nonspecific rTMS side effects, we also stimulated neural processes in two control sites. Using frameless stereotaxy, we positioned the stimulation coil to target (1) the LIPF region that was activated during fMRI (mean xyz = -48 35 5); (2) the homologous right-hemisphere region; and (3) an additional left parietal control site. At each site, "stimulated" items (600 msec of 7-Hz rTMS with Cadwell Round Coil) were intermixed with items presented without concurrent stimulation. Subsequently, subjects performed a recognition memory task for the words encountered. We found support for the predicted causal brainbehavior relationship, which was specific to LIPFC. When comparing recognition scores for stimulated items, normalized for variations in performance on nonstimulated trials, we found that words encoded under LIPFC stimulation were subsequently recognized with higher accuracy than words encoded under stimulation in the two cortical control sites. By contrast, no performance difference emerged when the two control sites were compared with each other. Based on additional analyses of the rTMS effects observed directly at the time of encoding (i.e., on semantic-decision performance), we suggest that LIPFC stimulation may have produced its effect on recognition memory, at least in part, through the triggering of more extensive processing of the stimulated items and an ensuing gain in item distinctiveness. Physiological processes of facilitation probably also contributed to the observed memory benefit. Together, these findings suggest that LIPFC does play a causal role in episodic memory formation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. R. Anderson, D. Byrne, J. M. Fincham, and P. Gunn Role of Prefrontal and Parietal Cortices in Associative Learning Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2008; 18(4): 904 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Luber, A.D. Stanford, P. Bulow, T. Nguyen, B.C. Rakitin, C. Habeck, R. Basner, Y. Stern, and S.H. Lisanby Remediation of Sleep-Deprivation-Induced Working Memory Impairment with fMRI-Guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Cereb Cortex, January 17, 2008; (2008) bhm231v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Devlin and K. E. Watkins Stimulating language: insights from TMS Brain, March 1, 2007; 130(3): 610 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Gough, A. C. Nobre, and J. T. Devlin Dissociating Linguistic Processes in the Left Inferior Frontal Cortex with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation J. Neurosci., August 31, 2005; 25(35): 8010 - 8016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ranganath, M. X. Cohen, and C. J. Brozinsky Working Memory Maintenance Contributes to Long-term Memory Formation: Neural and Behavioral Evidence J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2005; 17(7): 994 - 1010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kahn, A. Pascual-Leone, H. Theoret, F. Fregni, D. Clark, and A. D. Wagner Transient Disruption of Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex During Verbal Encoding Affects Subsequent Memory Performance J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 688 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| NEURAL COMPUTATION | J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE | MIT PRESS JOURNALS |