J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Köhler, S.
Right arrow Articles by Milner, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Köhler, S.
Right arrow Articles by Milner, B.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2004;16:178-188.)
© 2004 The MIT Press

Effects of Left Inferior Prefrontal Stimulation on Episodic Memory Formation: A Two-Stage fMRI–rTMS Study

Stefan Köhler

University of Western Ontario

Tomás Paus

McGill University

Randy L. Buckner

Washington University

Brenda Milner

McGill University

Successful recovery of words from episodic memory relies strongly on semantic processes at the time of encoding. Evidence from several functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies has shown that changes in neural activity in the left inferior prefrontal cortex (LIPFC) during semantic encoding predict subsequent memory performance. This evidence has been taken to suggest that LIPFC plays a critical role in memory formation. Functional neuroimaging findings, however, do not establish a causal brain–behavior relationship. To determine whether there is a causal link between LIPFC involvement at encoding and subsequent success in memory performance, we conducted a two-part study in which we first used fMRI to localize encoding-related activation in LIPFC and then employed repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to manipulate neural processes in LIPFC during semantic encoding. To demonstrate the neuroanatomical specificity of any observed effect and to control for nonspecific rTMS side effects, we also stimulated neural processes in two control sites. Using frameless stereotaxy, we positioned the stimulation coil to target (1) the LIPF region that was activated during fMRI (mean xyz = -48 35 5); (2) the homologous right-hemisphere region; and (3) an additional left parietal control site. At each site, "stimulated" items (600 msec of 7-Hz rTMS with Cadwell Round Coil) were intermixed with items presented without concurrent stimulation. Subsequently, subjects performed a recognition memory task for the words encountered. We found support for the predicted causal brain–behavior relationship, which was specific to LIPFC. When comparing recognition scores for stimulated items, normalized for variations in performance on nonstimulated trials, we found that words encoded under LIPFC stimulation were subsequently recognized with higher accuracy than words encoded under stimulation in the two cortical control sites. By contrast, no performance difference emerged when the two control sites were compared with each other. Based on additional analyses of the rTMS effects observed directly at the time of encoding (i.e., on semantic-decision performance), we suggest that LIPFC stimulation may have produced its effect on recognition memory, at least in part, through the triggering of more extensive processing of the stimulated items and an ensuing gain in item distinctiveness. Physiological processes of facilitation probably also contributed to the observed memory benefit. Together, these findings suggest that LIPFC does play a causal role in episodic memory formation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. R. Anderson, D. Byrne, J. M. Fincham, and P. Gunn
Role of Prefrontal and Parietal Cortices in Associative Learning
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2008; 18(4): 904 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
B. Luber, A.D. Stanford, P. Bulow, T. Nguyen, B.C. Rakitin, C. Habeck, R. Basner, Y. Stern, and S.H. Lisanby
Remediation of Sleep-Deprivation-Induced Working Memory Impairment with fMRI-Guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Cereb Cortex, January 17, 2008; (2008) bhm231v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
J. T. Devlin and K. E. Watkins
Stimulating language: insights from TMS
Brain, March 1, 2007; 130(3): 610 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. M. Gough, A. C. Nobre, and J. T. Devlin
Dissociating Linguistic Processes in the Left Inferior Frontal Cortex with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
J. Neurosci., August 31, 2005; 25(35): 8010 - 8016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
C. Ranganath, M. X. Cohen, and C. J. Brozinsky
Working Memory Maintenance Contributes to Long-term Memory Formation: Neural and Behavioral Evidence
J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2005; 17(7): 994 - 1010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Kahn, A. Pascual-Leone, H. Theoret, F. Fregni, D. Clark, and A. D. Wagner
Transient Disruption of Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex During Verbal Encoding Affects Subsequent Memory Performance
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 688 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by The MIT Press.