HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Howe, C. Q. Articles by Purves, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Howe, C. Q. Articles by Purves, D.

Size Contrast and Assimilation Explained by the Statistics of Natural Scene Geometry

Duke University

The term "size contrast and assimilation" refers to a large class of geometrical illusions in which the apparent sizes of identical visual targets in various contexts are different. Here we have examined whether these intriguing discrepancies between physical and perceived size can be explained by a visual process in which percepts are determined by the probability distribution of the possible real-world sources of retinal stimuli. To test this idea, we acquired a range image database of natural scenes that specified the location of every image point in 3-D space. By sampling the possible physical sources of various size contrast or assimilation stimuli in the database, we determined the probability distributions of the size of the target in the images generated by these sources. For each of the various stimuli tested, these probability distributions of target size in different contexts accurately predicted the perceptual effects reported in psychophysical studies. We conclude that size contrast and assimilation effects are a further manifestation of a fundamentally probabilistic process of visual perception.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Q. Howe, Z. Yang, and D. Purves The Poggendorff illusion explained by natural scene geometry PNAS, May 24, 2005; 102(21): 7707 - 7712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Q. Howe and D. Purves Natural-scene geometry predicts the perception of angles and line orientation PNAS, January 25, 2005; 102(4): 1228 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Q. Howe and D. Purves The Muller-Lyer illusion explained by the statistics of image-source relationships PNAS, January 25, 2005; 102(4): 1234 - 1239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]