HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Obleser, J. Articles by Lahiri, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Obleser, J. Articles by Lahiri, A.

Magnetic Brain Response Mirrors Extraction of Phonological Features from Spoken Vowels

University of Konstanz, Germany

This study further elucidates determinants of vowel perception in the human auditory cortex. The vowel inventory of a given language can be classified on the basis of phonological features which are closely linked to acoustic properties. A cortical representation of speech sounds based on these phonological features might explain the surprisingly inverse correlation between immense variance in the acoustic signal and high accuracy of speech recognition. We investigated timing and mapping of the N100m elicited by 42 tokens of seven natural German vowels varying along the phonological features tongue height (corresponding to the frequency of the first formant) and place of articulation (corresponding to the frequency of the second and third formants). Auditory-evoked fields were recorded using a 148-channel whole-head magnetometer while subjects performed target vowel detection tasks. Source location differences appeared to be driven by place of articulation: Vowels with mutually exclusive place of articulation features, namely, coronal and dorsal elicited separate centers of activation along the posterior–anterior axis. Additionally, the time course of activation as reflected in the N100m peak latency distinguished between vowel categories especially when the spatial distinctiveness of cortical activation was low. In sum, results suggest that both N100m latency and source location as well as their interaction reflect properties of speech stimuli that correspond to abstract phonological features.

Key Words: magnetoencephalography • N100m • Auditory system • Phonological features • Vowels • Speech • Language processing

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Larsson, F. Vera Constan, N. Sebastian-Galles, and G. Deco Lexical plasticity in early bilinguals does not alter phoneme categories: I. Neurodynamical modeling. J. Cogn. Neurosci., January 1, 2008; 20(1): 76 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Frye, J. McGraw Fisher, A. Coty, M. Zarella, J. Liederman, and E. Halgren Linear coding of voice onset time. J. Cogn. Neurosci., September 1, 2007; 19(9): 1476 - 1487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Obleser, S. K. Scott, and C. Eulitz Now You Hear It, Now You Don't: Transient Traces of Consonants and their Nonspeech Analogues in the Human Brain Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2006; 16(8): 1069 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Pulvermuller, M. Huss, F. Kherif, F. Moscoso del Prado Martin, O. Hauk, and Y. Shtyrov Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds PNAS, May 16, 2006; 103(20): 7865 - 7870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]