J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schirmer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kotz, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schirmer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kotz, S. A.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2003;15:1135-1148.)
© 2003 The MIT Press

ERP Evidence for a Sex-Specific Stroop Effect in Emotional Speech

Annett Schirmer and Sonja A. Kotz

Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience

The present study investigated the interaction of emotional prosody and word valence during emotional comprehension in men and women. In a prosody–word interference task, participants listened to positive, neutral, and negative words that were spoken with a happy, neutral, and angry prosody. Participants were asked to rate word valence while ignoring emotional prosody, or vice versa. Congruent stimuli were responded faster and more accurately as compared to incongruent emotional stimuli. This behavioral effect was more salient for the word valence task than for the prosodic task and was comparable between men and women. The event-related potentials (ERPs) revealed a smaller N400 amplitude for congruent as compared to emotionally incongruent stimuli. This ERP effect, however, was significant only for the word valence judgment and only for female listeners. The present data suggest that the word valence judgment was more difficult and more easily influenced by task-irrelevant emotional information than the prosodic task in both men and women. Furthermore, although emotional prosody and word valence may have a similar influence on an emotional judgment in both sexes, ERPs indicate sex differences in the underlying processing. Women, but not men, show an interaction between prosody and word valence during a semantic processing stage.


Key Words: ERP • N400 • Stroop • interference • emotional prosody • speech • word processing • sex differences




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
H. Hill, F. Ott, C. Herbert, and M. Weisbrod
Response Execution in Lexical Decision Tasks Obscures Sex-specific Lateralization Effects in Language Processing: Evidence from Event-related Potential Measures during Word Reading
Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2006; 16(7): 978 - 989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav Cogn Neurosci RevHome page
D. E. Everhart, H. A. Demaree, and A. J. Shipley
Perception of emotional prosody: moving toward a model that incorporates sex-related differences.
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, June 1, 2006; 5(2): 92 - 102.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by The MIT Press.