HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jiang, Y. Articles by Kanwisher, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jiang, Y. Articles by Kanwisher, N.

Common Neural Mechanisms for Response Selection and Perceptual Processing

MIT

Nancy Kanwisher

MIT
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, USA

Behavioral evidence supports a dissociation between response selection (RS; stimulus-to-response [S–R] mapping) and perceptual discrimination (PD): The former may be subject to a central processing bottleneck, whereas the latter is not (Pashler, 1994). We previously (Jiang & Kanwisher, 2003) identified a set of frontal and parietal regions involved in RS as those that produce a stronger signal when subjects follow a difficult S–R mapping rule than an easy mapping rule. Here, we test whether any of these regions are selectively activated by RS and not perceptual processing, as predicted by the central bottleneck view. In Experiment 1, subjects indicated which of four parallel lines was unique in length; PD was indexed by a higher BOLD response when the discrimination was difficult versus easy. Stimuli and responses were closely matched across conditions. We found that all regions-of-interest (ROIs) engaged by RS were also engaged by perceptual processing, arguing against the existence of mechanisms exclusively involved in RS. In Experiments 2 and 3, we asked what processes might go on in these ROIs, such that they could be recruited by both RS and perceptual processing. Our data argue against an account of this common activation in terms of spatial processing or general task difficulty. Thus, PD may recruit the same central processes that are engaged by RS.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Young, F. Cushman, M. Hauser, and R. Saxe The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment PNAS, May 15, 2007; 104(20): 8235 - 8240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Cavina-Pratesi, K. F. Valyear, J. C. Culham, S. Kohler, S. S. Obhi, C. A. Marzi, and M. A. Goodale Dissociating arbitrary stimulus-response mapping from movement planning during preparatory period: evidence from event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci., March 8, 2006; 26(10): 2704 - 2713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Desai, L. L. Conant, E. Waldron, and J. R. Binder FMRI of past tense processing: the effects of phonological complexity and task difficulty. J. Cogn. Neurosci., February 1, 2006; 18(2): 278 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Jiang and N. Kanwisher Common Neural Substrates for Response Selection across Modalities and Mapping Paradigms J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2003; 15(8): 1080 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]