HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jiang, Y. Articles by Kanwisher, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jiang, Y. Articles by Kanwisher, N.

Common Neural Substrates for Response Selection across Modalities and Mapping Paradigms

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Nancy Kanwisher

Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown

In many situations, people can only compute one stimulus-to-response mapping at a time, suggesting that response selection constitutes a "central processing bottleneck" in human information processing. Using fMRI, we tested whether common or distinct brain regions were involved in response selection across visual and auditory inputs, and across spatial and nonspatial mapping rules. We isolated brain regions involved in response selection by comparing two conditions that were identical in perceptual input and motor output, but differed in the complexity of the mapping rule. In the visual–manual task of Experiment 1, four vertical lines were positioned from left to right, and subjects pressed one of four keys to report which line was unique in length. In the auditory–manual task of Experiment 2, four tones were presented in succession, and subjects pressed one of four keys to report which tone was unique in duration. For both visual and auditory tasks, the mapping between target position and key position was either spatially compatible or incompatible. In the verbal task of Experiment 3, subjects used nonspatial mappings that were either compatible ("same" if colors matched; "different" if they mismatched) or incompatible (the opposite). Extensive activation overlap was observed across all three experiments for incompatible versus compatible mapping in bilateral parietal and frontal regions. Our results indicate that common neural substrates are involved in response selection across input modalities and across spatial and nonspatial domains of stimulus-to-response mapping, consistent with behavioral evidence that response selection is a central process.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. D. Chambers, M. A. Bellgrove, I. C. Gould, T. English, H. Garavan, E. McNaught, M. Kamke, and J. B. Mattingley Dissociable Mechanisms of Cognitive Control in Prefrontal and Premotor Cortex J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3638 - 3647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Fias, J. Lammertyn, B. Caessens, and G. A. Orban Processing of Abstract Ordinal Knowledge in the Horizontal Segment of the Intraparietal Sulcus J. Neurosci., August 15, 2007; 27(33): 8952 - 8956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Cohen Kadosh, K. Cohen Kadosh, D. E. J. Linden, W. Gevers, A. Berger, and A. Henik The Brain Locus of Interaction between Number and Size: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Event-related Potential Study J. Cogn. Neurosci., June 1, 2007; 19(6): 957 - 970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. E. Downing, A. J. Wiggett, and M. V. Peelen Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Overlapping Lateral Occipitotemporal Activations Using Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis J. Neurosci., January 3, 2007; 27(1): 226 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Orfanidou, W. D. Marslen-Wilson, and M. H. Davis Neural response suppression predicts repetition priming of spoken words and pseudowords. J. Cogn. Neurosci., August 1, 2006; 18(8): 1237 - 1252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Cavina-Pratesi, K. F. Valyear, J. C. Culham, S. Kohler, S. S. Obhi, C. A. Marzi, and M. A. Goodale Dissociating arbitrary stimulus-response mapping from movement planning during preparatory period: evidence from event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci., March 8, 2006; 26(10): 2704 - 2713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Desai, L. L. Conant, E. Waldron, and J. R. Binder FMRI of past tense processing: the effects of phonological complexity and task difficulty. J. Cogn. Neurosci., February 1, 2006; 18(2): 278 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Shannon and R. L. Buckner Functional-Anatomic Correlates of Memory Retrieval That Suggest Nontraditional Processing Roles for Multiple Distinct Regions within Posterior Parietal Cortex J. Neurosci., November 10, 2004; 24(45): 10084 - 10092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Gobel, H. Johansen-Berg, T. Behrens, and M. F. S. Rushworth Response-Selection-Related Parietal Activation during Number Comparison J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2004; 16(9): 1536 - 1551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]