HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y. Articles by Giard, M. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y. Articles by Giard, M. H.

Electrophysiological Correlates of Age and Gender Perception on Human Faces

INSERM-U280, Lyon, France

In a previous experiment using scalp event-related potentials (ERPs), we have described the neuroelectric activities associated with the processing of gender information on human faces (Mouchetant-Rostaing, Giard, Bentin, Aguera, & Pernier, 2000). Here we extend this study by examining the processing of age on faces using a similar experimental paradigm, and we compare age and gender processing. In one session, faces were of the same gender (women) and of one age range (young or old), to reduce gender and age processing. In a second session, faces of young and old women were randomly intermixed but age was irrelevant for the task, hence, age discrimination, if any, was assumed to be incidental. In the third and fourth sessions, faces had to be explicitly categorized according to their age or gender, respectively (intentional discrimination). Neither age nor gender processing affected the occipito-temporal N170 component often associated with the detection of physiognomic features and global structural encoding of faces. Rather, the three age and gender discrimination conditions induced similar fronto-central activities around 145–185 msec. In our previous experiment, this ERP pattern was also found for implicit and explicit categorization of gender from faces but not in a control condition manipulating hand stimuli (Mouchetant-Rostaing, Giard, Bentin, et al., 2000). Whatever their exact nature, these 145–185 msec effects therefore suggest, first, that similar mechanisms could be engaged in age and gender perception, and second, that age and gender may be implicitly processed irrespective of their relevance to the task, through somewhat specialized mechanisms. Additional ERP effects were found at early latencies (45–90 msec) in all three discrimination conditions, and around 200–400 msec during explicit age and gender discrimination. These effects have been previously found in control conditions manipulating nonfacial stimuli and may therefore be related to more general categorization processes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. F. Dovidio, A. R. Pearson, and P. Orr Social Psychology and Neuroscience: Strange Bedfellows or a Healthy Marriage? Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2008; 11(2): 247 - 263. [Abstract] [PDF]