J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knauff, M.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson-Laird, P. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knauff, M.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson-Laird, P. N.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2003;15:559-573.)
© 2003 The MIT Press

Reasoning, Models, and Images: Behavioral Measures and Cortical Activity

Markus Knauff

Freiburg University
Oldenburg University

Thomas Fangmeier and Christian C. Ruff

Freiburg University

P. N. Johnson-Laird

Princeton University

The goal of this study was to investigate the neurocognitive processes of mental imagery in deductive reasoning. Behavioral studies yielded four sorts of verbal relations: (1) visuospatial relations that are easy to envisage both visually and spatially; (2) visual relations that are easy to envisage visually but hard to envisage spatially; (3) spatial relations that are hard to envisage visually but easy to envisage spatially; and (4) control relations that are hard to envisage both visually and spatially. In three experiments, visual relations slowed the process of reasoning in comparison with control relations, whereas visuospatial and spatial relations yielded inferences comparable to those of control relations. An experiment using functional magnetic resonance imaging showed that in the absence of any correlated visual input (problems were presented acoustically via headphones), all types of reasoning problems evoked activity in the left middle temporal gyrus, in the right superior parietal cortex, and bilaterally in the precuneus. In the prefrontal cortex, increased activity was found in the middle and inferior frontal gyri. However, only the problems based on visual relations also activated areas of the visual association cortex corresponding to V2. The results indicate that cortical activity during reasoning depends on the nature of verbal relations. All relations elicit mental models that underlie reasoning, but visual relations in addition elicit visual images. This account resolves inconsistencies in the previous literature.


Key Words: Reasoning • Mental models • Mental images • Parieto-occipital cortex • fMRI




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
V. Goel, M. Tierney, L. Sheesley, A. Bartolo, O. Vartanian, and J. Grafman
Hemispheric Specialization in Human Prefrontal Cortex for Resolving Certain and Uncertain Inferences
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2007; 17(10): 2245 - 2250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
T. Fangmeier, M. Knauff, C. C. Ruff, and V. Sloutsky
FMRI evidence for a three-stage model of deductive reasoning.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2006; 18(3): 320 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
A. E. Cavanna and M. R. Trimble
The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates
Brain, March 1, 2006; 129(3): 564 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by The MIT Press.