J. Cogn. Neurosci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liebenthal, E.
Right arrow Articles by Remez, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liebenthal, E.
Right arrow Articles by Remez, R. E.
(Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2003;15:549-558.)
© 2003 The MIT Press

Short-Term Reorganization of Auditory Analysis Induced by Phonetic Experience

Einat Liebenthal and Jeffrey R. Binder

Medical College of Wisconsin

Rebecca L. Piorkowski and Robert E. Remez

Barnard College

Sine wave replicas of spoken words can be perceived both as nonphonetic auditory forms and as words, depending on a listener's experience. In this study, brain areas activated by sine wave words were studied with fMRI in two conditions: when subjects perceived the sounds spontaneously as nonphonetic auditory forms ("naïve condition") and after instruction and brief practice attending to their phonetic attributes ("informed condition"). The test items were composed such that half replicated natural words ("phonetic items") and the other half did not, because the tone analogs of the first and third formants had been temporally reversed ("nonphonetic items"). Subjects were asked to decide whether an isolated tone analog of the second formant (T2) presented before the sine wave word (T1234) was included in it. Experience in attending to the phonetic properties of the sinusoids interfered with this auditory matching task and was accompanied by a decrease in auditory cortex activation with word replicas but not with the acoustically matched nonphonetic items. Because the activation patterns elicited by equivalent acoustic test items depended on a listener's awareness of their phonetic potential, this indicates that the analysis of speech sounds in the auditory cortex is distinct from the simple resolution of auditory form, and is not a mere consequence of acoustic complexity. Because arbitrary acoustic patterns did not evoke the response observed for phonetic patterns, these findings suggest that the perception of speech is contingent on the presence of familiar patterns of spectral variation. The results are consistent with a short-term functional reorganization of auditory analysis induced by phonetic experience with sine wave replicas and contingent on the dynamic acoustic structure of speech.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D. A. Hall and C. J. Plack
Pitch Processing Sites in the Human Auditory Brain
Cereb Cortex, July 4, 2008; (2008) bhn108v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
R. Desai, E. Liebenthal, E. Waldron, and J. R. Binder
Left Posterior Temporal Regions are Sensitive to Auditory Categorization.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2008; 20(7): 1174 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
E. Liebenthal, J. R. Binder, S. M. Spitzer, E. T. Possing, and D. A. Medler
Neural Substrates of Phonemic Perception
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2005; 15(10): 1621 - 1631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
G. Dehaene-Lambertz and T. Gliga
Common Neural Basis for Phoneme Processing in Infants and Adults
J. Cogn. Neurosci., September 1, 2004; 16(8): 1375 - 1387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A.L. Giraud, C. Kell, C. Thierfelder, P. Sterzer, M.O. Russ, C. Preibisch, and A. Kleinschmidt
Contributions of Sensory Input, Auditory Search and Verbal Comprehension to Cortical Activity during Speech Processing
Cereb Cortex, March 1, 2004; 14(3): 247 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEURAL COMPUTATION J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by The MIT Press.