HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hairston, W. D. Articles by Schirillo, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hairston, W. D. Articles by Schirillo, J. A.

Visual Localization Ability Influences Cross-Modal Bias

Wake Forest University

The ability of a visual signal to influence the localization of an auditory target (i.e., "cross-modal bias") was examined as a function of the spatial disparity between the two stimuli and their absolute locations in space. Three experimental issues were examined: (a) the effect of a spatially disparate visual stimulus on auditory localization judgments; (b) how the ability to localize visual, auditory, and spatially aligned multisensory (visual–auditory) targets is related to cross-modal bias, and (c) the relationship between the magnitude of cross-modal bias and the perception that the two stimuli are spatially "unified" (i.e., originate from the same location). Whereas variability in localization of auditory targets was large and fairly uniform for all tested locations, variability in localizing visual or spatially aligned multisensory targets was much smaller, and increased with increasing distance from the midline. This trend proved to be strongly correlated with biasing effectiveness, for although visual–auditory bias was unexpectedly large in all conditions tested, it decreased progressively (as localization variability increased) with increasing distance from the midline. Thus, central visual stimuli had a substantially greater biasing effect on auditory target localization than did more peripheral visual stimuli. It was also apparent that cross-modal bias decreased as the degree of visual–auditory disparity increased. Consequently, the greatest visual–auditory biases were obtained with small disparities at central locations. In all cases, the magnitude of these biases covaried with judgments of spatial unity. The results suggest that functional properties of the visual system play the predominant role in determining these visual–auditory interactions and that cross-modal biases can be substantially greater than previously noted.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Leo, N. Bolognini, C. Passamonti, B. E. Stein, and E. Ladavas Cross-modal localization in hemianopia: new insights on multisensory integration Brain, March 1, 2008; 131(3): 855 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Sato, T. Toyoizumi, and K. Aihara Bayesian Inference Explains Perception of Unity and Ventriloquism Aftereffect: Identification of Common Sources of Audiovisual Stimuli. Neural Comput., December 1, 2007; 19(12): 3335 - 3355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Yuval-Greenberg and L. Y. Deouell What You See Is Not (Always) What You Hear: Induced Gamma Band Responses Reflect Cross-Modal Interactions in Familiar Object Recognition J. Neurosci., January 31, 2007; 27(5): 1090 - 1096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Busse, K. C. Roberts, R. E. Crist, D. H. Weissman, and M. G. Woldorff The spread of attention across modalities and space in a multisensory object PNAS, December 20, 2005; 102(51): 18751 - 18756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Murray, S. Molholm, C. M. Michel, D. J. Heslenfeld, W. Ritter, D. C. Javitt, C. E. Schroeder, and J. J. Foxe Grabbing Your Ear: Rapid Auditory-Somatosensory Multisensory Interactions in Low-level Sensory Cortices Are Not Constrained by Stimulus Alignment Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2005; 15(7): 963 - 974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. Neelon, D. S. Brungart, and B. D. Simpson The Isoazimuthal Perception of Sounds across Distance: A Preliminary Investigation into the Location of the Audio Egocenter J. Neurosci., September 1, 2004; 24(35): 7640 - 7647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]