HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Grosbras, M.-H. Articles by Paus, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Grosbras, M.-H. Articles by Paus, T.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Frontal Eye Field: Effects on Visual Perception and Attention

Marie-Hélène Grosbras and Tomá Paus

McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada

When looking at one object, human subjects can shift their attention to another object in their visual field without moving the eyes. Such shifts of attention activate the same brain regions as those involved in the execution of eye movements. Here we investigate the role of one of the main cortical oculomotor area, namely, the frontal eye field (FEF),in shifts of attention. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a technique known to disrupt transiently eye-movements preparation. We hypothesized that if the FEF is a necessary element in the network involved in shifting attention without moving the eyes, then TMS should also disrupt visuospatial attention.

For each volunteer, we positioned the TMS coil over the probabilistic anatomical location of the FEF, and we verified that single pulses delayed eye movements. We then applied TMS during a visuospatial attention task. In this task, a central arrow directed shifts of attention and the subject responded by a keypress to a subsequent visual peripheral target without moving the eyes from the central fixation point. In a few trials, the cue was invalid or uninformative, yielding slower responses than when the cue was valid. We delivered single pulses either 53 msec before or 70 msec after target onset.

Contrary to our prediction, the main effect of the stimulation was a decrease in reaction time when it was applied 53 msec before target onset. TMS over the left hemisphere facilitated responses to targets in the right hemifield only and for all cueing conditions, whereas TMS over the right hemisphere had a bilateral effect for valid and neutral but not invalid cueing. Thus, TMS interfered with shift of attention only in the case of right hemisphere stimulation: it increased the cost of invalid cueing.

Our results suggest that TMS over the FEF facilitates visual detection, and thereby reduces reaction time. This finding provides new insights into the role of the human FEF in processing visual information. The functional asymmetry observed for both facilitation of visual detection and interference with shifts of attention provides further evidence for the dominance of the right hemisphere for those processes. Our results also underline that the disruptive or facilitative effect of TMS over a given region depends upon the behavioral context.

Key Words: Attention • FEF • TMS • Oculomotor network

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C.-H. Juan, N. G. Muggleton, O. J. L. Tzeng, D. L. Hung, A. Cowey, and V. Walsh Segregation of Visual Selection and Saccades in Human Frontal Eye Fields Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2008; 18(10): 2410 - 2415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Silvanto, N. Muggleton, N. Lavie, and V. Walsh The Perceptual and Functional Consequences of Parietal Top-Down Modulation on the Visual Cortex Cereb Cortex, May 30, 2008; (2008) bhn091v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. C. Ruff, S. Bestmann, F. Blankenburg, O. Bjoertomt, O. Josephs, N. Weiskopf, R. Deichmann, and J. Driver Distinct Causal Influences of Parietal Versus Frontal Areas on Human Visual Cortex: Evidence from Concurrent TMS-fMRI Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2008; 18(4): 817 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Kelley, J. T. Serences, B. Giesbrecht, and S. Yantis Cortical Mechanisms for Shifting and Holding Visuospatial Attention Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2008; 18(1): 114 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Romei, M. M. Murray, L. B. Merabet, and G. Thut Occipital Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Has Opposing Effects on Visual and Auditory Stimulus Detection: Implications for Multisensory Interactions J. Neurosci., October 24, 2007; 27(43): 11465 - 11472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. O'Shea, N. G. Muggleton, A. Cowey, and V. Walsh Human Frontal Eye Fields and Spatial Priming of Pop-out. J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2007; 19(7): 1140 - 1151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Armstrong and T. Moore Rapid enhancement of visual cortical response discriminability by microstimulation of the frontal eye field PNAS, May 29, 2007; 104(22): 9499 - 9504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C.J. Taylor, A. C. Nobre, and M. F.S. Rushworth FEF TMS Affects Visual Cortical Activity Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2007; 17(2): 391 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Windmann, M. Wehrmann, P. Calabrese, and O. Gunturkun Role of the Prefrontal Cortex in Attentional Control over Bistable Vision. J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2006; 18(3): 456 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Gagnon, T. Paus, M.-H. Grosbras, G. B. Pike, and G. A. O'Driscoll Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Frontal Oculomotor Regions during Smooth Pursuit J. Neurosci., January 11, 2006; 26(2): 458 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Olk, E. Chang, A. Kingstone, and T. Ro Modulation of Antisaccades by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Frontal Eye Field Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2006; 16(1): 76 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Hung, J. Driver, and V. Walsh Visual Selection and Posterior Parietal Cortex: Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Partial Report Analyzed by Bundesen's Theory of Visual Attention J. Neurosci., October 19, 2005; 25(42): 9602 - 9612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. G. Thompson, K. L. Biscoe, and T. R. Sato Neuronal Basis of Covert Spatial Attention in the Frontal Eye Field J. Neurosci., October 12, 2005; 25(41): 9479 - 9487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-H. Juan, S. M. Shorter-Jacobi, and J. D. Schall Dissociation of spatial attention and saccade preparation PNAS, October 26, 2004; 101(43): 15541 - 15544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. O'Shea, N. G. Muggleton, A. Cowey, and V. Walsh Timing of Target Discrimination in Human Frontal Eye Fields J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2004; 16(6): 1060 - 1067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kohler, T. Paus, R. L. Buckner, and B. Milner Effects of Left Inferior Prefrontal Stimulation on Episodic Memory Formation: A Two-Stage fMRI-rTMS Study J. Cogn. Neurosci., February 1, 2004; 16(2): 178 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Robertson, H. Theoret, and A. Pascual-Leone Studies in Cognition: The Problems Solved and Created by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation J. Cogn. Neurosci., October 1, 2003; 15(7): 948 - 960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. G. Muggleton, C.-H. Juan, A. Cowey, and V. Walsh Human Frontal Eye Fields and Visual Search J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 3340 - 3343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]